BACKGROUND: With the reorganization of primary care into Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) teams, the Veteran Affairs Health System (VA) aims to ensure all patients receive care based on patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles. However, some patients receive the preponderance of care from specialty rather than primary care clinics because of the special nature of their clinical conditions. We examined seven VA (HIV) clinics as a model to test the extent to which such patients receive PCMH-principled care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which HIV specialty care in VA conforms to PCMH principles. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one HIV providers from seven HIV clinics and 20 patients from four of these clinics. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews with HIV clinic providers and patients about care practices and adherence to PCMH principles. Using an iterative approach, data was analyzed using both a content analysis and an a priori, PCMH-principled coding strategy. KEY RESULTS: Patients with HIV receive varying levels of PCMH-principled care across a range of VA HIV clinic structures. The more PCMH-principled HIV clinics largely functioned as PCMHs; patients received integrated, coordinated, comprehensive primary care within a dedicated HIV clinic. In contrast, some clinics were unable to meet the criteria of being a patient's medical home, and instead functioned primarily as a place to receive HIV-related services with limited care coordination. Patients from the less PCMH-principled clinics reported less satisfaction with their care. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a large, integrated healthcare system, there is wide variation in patients' receipt of PCMH-principled care in specialty care settings. In order to meet the goal of having all patients receiving PCMH-principled care, there needs to be careful consideration of where primary and specialty care services are delivered and coordinated. The best mechanisms for ensuring that patients with complex medical conditions receive PCMH-principled care may need to be tailored to different specialty care contexts.
BACKGROUND: With the reorganization of primary care into Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) teams, the Veteran Affairs Health System (VA) aims to ensure all patients receive care based on patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles. However, some patients receive the preponderance of care from specialty rather than primary care clinics because of the special nature of their clinical conditions. We examined seven VA (HIV) clinics as a model to test the extent to which such patients receive PCMH-principled care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which HIV specialty care in VA conforms to PCMH principles. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one HIV providers from seven HIV clinics and 20 patients from four of these clinics. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews with HIV clinic providers and patients about care practices and adherence to PCMH principles. Using an iterative approach, data was analyzed using both a content analysis and an a priori, PCMH-principled coding strategy. KEY RESULTS:Patients with HIV receive varying levels of PCMH-principled care across a range of VA HIV clinic structures. The more PCMH-principled HIV clinics largely functioned as PCMHs; patients received integrated, coordinated, comprehensive primary care within a dedicated HIV clinic. In contrast, some clinics were unable to meet the criteria of being a patient's medical home, and instead functioned primarily as a place to receive HIV-related services with limited care coordination. Patients from the less PCMH-principled clinics reported less satisfaction with their care. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a large, integrated healthcare system, there is wide variation in patients' receipt of PCMH-principled care in specialty care settings. In order to meet the goal of having all patients receiving PCMH-principled care, there needs to be careful consideration of where primary and specialty care services are delivered and coordinated. The best mechanisms for ensuring that patients with complex medical conditions receive PCMH-principled care may need to be tailored to different specialty care contexts.
Authors: Eve A Kerr; Elizabeth A McGlynn; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Steven M Asch Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Steven M Asch; Barbara Phillips; Henry Anaya; Candice Bowman; Sophia Chang; Samuel Bozzette Journal: Mil Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: George L Jackson; Benjamin J Powers; Ranee Chatterjee; Janet Prvu Bettger; Alex R Kemper; Vic Hasselblad; Rowena J Dolor; R Julian Irvine; Brooke L Heidenfelder; Amy S Kendrick; Rebecca Gray; John W Williams Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Christopher B Forrest; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ann-Marie Rosland; Karin Nelson; Haili Sun; Emily D Dolan; Charles Maynard; Christopher Bryson; Richard Stark; Joanne M Shear; Eve Kerr; Stephan D Fihn; Gordon Schectman Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Joseph L Goulet; Shawn L Fultz; David Rimland; Adeel Butt; Cynthia Gibert; Maria Rodriguez-Barradas; Kendall Bryant; Amy C Justice Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Annette J Berendsen; G Majella de Jong; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Janny H Dekker; Jan Schuling Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kristina M Cordasco; Susan M Frayne; Devan Kansagara; Donna M Zulman; Steven M Asch; Robert E Burke; Edward P Post; Stephan D Fihn; Thomas Klobucar; Laurence J Meyer; Susan R Kirsh; David Atkins Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Emmeline Chuang; Julian Brunner; Selene Mak; Alison B Hamilton; Ismelda Canelo; Jill Darling; Lisa V Rubenstein; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2017-01-04
Authors: A Ben Appenheimer; Barbara Bokhour; D Keith McInnes; Kelly K Richardson; Andrew L Thurman; Brice F Beck; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Steven M Asch; Amanda M Midboe; Thom Taylor; Kelly Dvorin; Allen L Gifford; Michael E Ohl Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Sara Spinella; Nicole McCune; Rebecca McCarthy; Maria El-Tahch; Jennifer George; Mary Dorritie; Alyssa Ford; Kira Posteraro; Deborah DiNardo Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Lindsey Powers Happ; Anne K Monroe; Heather A Young; Yan Ma; Alan E Greenberg; Michael A Horberg; Amanda D Castel Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Timothy P Hogan; Tana M Luger; Julie E Volkman; Mary Rocheleau; Nora Mueller; Anna M Barker; Kim M Nazi; Thomas K Houston; Barbara G Bokhour Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Claire E Kendall; Esther Susanna Shoemaker; Lisa Boucher; Danielle E Rolfe; Lois Crowe; Marissa Becker; Shabnam Asghari; Sean B Rourke; Ron Rosenes; Christine Bibeau; Philip Lundrigan; Clare Liddy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240