Emmeline Chuang1, Julian Brunner2, Selene Mak2, Alison B Hamilton3, Ismelda Canelo3, Jill Darling3, Lisa V Rubenstein4, Elizabeth M Yano4. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: emchuang@ucla.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 3. HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative aims to ensure that all patients receive care consistent with medical home principles. Women veterans' unique care needs and minority status within the VA pose challenges to delivery of equitable, comprehensive primary care for this population. Currently, little is known about whether and/or how PACT should be tailored to better meet women veterans' needs. METHODS: In 2014, we conducted semistructured interviews with 73 primary care providers and staff to examine facilitators and barriers encountered in providing PACT-principled care to women veterans. Respondents were located in eight VA medical centers in eight different states across the United States. RESULTS: Respondents perceived PACT as improving continuity of care for patients and as increasing ability of nursing staff to practice at the top of their license. However, the implementation of core medical home features and team huddles was inconsistent and varied both within and across medical centers. Short staffing, inclusion of part-time providers on teams, balancing performance requirements for continuity and same-day access, and space constraints were identified as ongoing barriers to PACT implementation. Challenges unique to care of women veterans included a higher prevalence of psychosocial needs, the need for specialized training of primary care personnel, and short staffing owing to additional sharing of primary care support staff with specialist providers. CONCLUSION: Providers and staff face unique challenges in delivering comprehensive primary care to women veterans that may require special policy, practice, and management action if benefits of PACT are to be fully realized for this population.
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative aims to ensure that all patients receive care consistent with medical home principles. Women veterans' unique care needs and minority status within the VA pose challenges to delivery of equitable, comprehensive primary care for this population. Currently, little is known about whether and/or how PACT should be tailored to better meet women veterans' needs. METHODS: In 2014, we conducted semistructured interviews with 73 primary care providers and staff to examine facilitators and barriers encountered in providing PACT-principled care to women veterans. Respondents were located in eight VA medical centers in eight different states across the United States. RESULTS: Respondents perceived PACT as improving continuity of care for patients and as increasing ability of nursing staff to practice at the top of their license. However, the implementation of core medical home features and team huddles was inconsistent and varied both within and across medical centers. Short staffing, inclusion of part-time providers on teams, balancing performance requirements for continuity and same-day access, and space constraints were identified as ongoing barriers to PACT implementation. Challenges unique to care of women veterans included a higher prevalence of psychosocial needs, the need for specialized training of primary care personnel, and short staffing owing to additional sharing of primary care support staff with specialist providers. CONCLUSION: Providers and staff face unique challenges in delivering comprehensive primary care to women veterans that may require special policy, practice, and management action if benefits of PACT are to be fully realized for this population.
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Karleen F Giannitrapani; Susan Stockdale; Alison B Hamilton; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lori A Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Cynthia Brandt; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Natalya C Maisel; Steven M Wright; Vera S Gaetano; Heather Allore; Melissa Skanderson; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Elizabeth M Yano; Danielle Rose; Sally Haskell Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: John M Hollingsworth; Sanjay Saint; Rodney A Hayward; Mary A M Rogers; Lingling Zhang; David C Miller Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Chung-Chou H Chang; Melissa A McNeil; Jeff Whittle; Patricia M Hayes; Sarah Hudson Scholle Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Karin M Nelson; Christian Helfrich; Haili Sun; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Emily Dolan; Leslie Taylor; Edwin Wong; Charles Maynard; Susan E Hernandez; William Sanders; Ian Randall; Idamay Curtis; Gordon Schectman; Richard Stark; Stephan D Fihn Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Hilit F Mechaber; Rachel B Levine; Linda Baier Manwell; Marlon P Mundt; Mark Linzer; Mark Schwartz; Deborah Dowell; Perry An; Karla Felix; Julia McMurray; James Bobula; Mary Beth Plane; William Scheckler; John Frey; Jessica Sherrieb; Jessica Grettie; Barbara Horner-Ibler; Ann Maguire; Laura Paluch; Bernice Man; Anita Varkey; Elizabeth Arce; Joseph Rabatin; Elianne Riska; JudyAnn Bigby; Thomas R Konrad; Peggy Leatt; Stewart Babbott; Eric Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susan M Frayne; Diane V Carney; Lori Bastian; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Anne Sadler; Ruth Klap; Ciaran S Phibbs; Rachel Kimerling; Dawne Vogt; Ellen F Yee; Julia Y Lin; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Jill E Darling; Alison B Hamilton; Ismelda Canelo; Emmeline Chuang; Lisa S Meredith; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Alison B Hamilton; Julian Brunner; Cindy Cain; Emmeline Chuang; Tana M Luger; Ismelda Canelo; Lisa Rubenstein; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; David C Mohr; Alison B Hamilton; Danielle E Rose; Sally Haskell; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; Danielle Rose; Lisa S Meredith; Michael McClean; Timothy Dresselhaus; Susan Stockdale Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lois McCloskey; Judith Bernstein; Linda Goler-Blount; Ann Greiner; Anna Norton; Emily Jones; Chloe E Bird Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2021-03-07
Authors: Claire Than; Emmeline Chuang; Donna L Washington; Jack Needleman; Ismelda Canelo; Lisa S Meredith; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2020-02-22
Authors: Lori M Gawron; Sara Simonsen; Morgan M Millar; Jessica Lewis-Caporal; Shardool Patel; Rebecca G Simmons Journal: South Med J Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Claire A Hoffmire; Lisa A Brenner; Jodie Katon; Laurel A Gaeddert; Christin N Miller; Alexandra L Schneider; Lindsey L Monteith Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2022-03-08