Literature DB >> 24715378

Support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United States: public attitudes from 2011 to 2013.

Young Suh1, Rebecca Puhl, Sai Liu, Frances Fleming Milici.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Public attitudes about three proposed laws prohibiting weight discrimination in the US, from 2011 to 2013 were examined.
METHODS: An online survey using a diverse national sample of US adults to assess their level of support for three specific laws against weight discrimination was conducted. Data collection occurred between June and July in 2011 (n = 1,098), 2012 (n = 1,202), and 2013 (n = 1,202).
RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2013, support for laws prohibiting weight discrimination remained consistent, and in some cases became increasingly supportive, primarily in 2012-2013. At least 75% of participants consistently favored laws prohibiting weight discrimination in the workplace. Individuals became increasingly supportive of extending disability protections for individuals with obesity (62% in 2011 to 69% in 2013) and adding body weight as a protected class in Civil Rights statutes (70% in 2011 to 76% in 2013). Analyses highlight specific predictors of support (gender, race, education, and political affiliation).
CONCLUSIONS: There is strong, consistent support for policies prohibiting weight discrimination. These findings have important implications for developing specific antidiscrimination legislation to protect Americans with obesity and improve their quality of life.
Copyright © 2014 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychosocial; Public Health; Public Policy; Stigma; Weight-related Discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24715378     DOI: 10.1002/oby.20750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  12 in total

1.  Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

Authors:  C Sikorski; J Spahlholz; M Hartlev; S G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Legislating for weight-based equality: national trends in public support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination.

Authors:  R M Puhl; Y Suh; X Li
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Potential Policies and Laws to Prohibit Weight Discrimination: Public Views from 4 Countries.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Janet D Latner; Kerry S O'Brien; Joerg Luedicke; Sigrun Danielsdottir; Ximena Ramos Salas
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Health Consequences of Weight Stigma: Implications for Obesity Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Puhl; Young Suh
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  The development of scientific evidence for health policies for obesity: why and how?

Authors:  M B Richardson; M S Williams; K R Fontaine; D B Allison
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Policies to address weight discrimination and bullying: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management from six nations.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Leah M Lessard; Rebecca L Pearl; Allison Grupski; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Public Support for Weight-Related Antidiscrimination Laws and Policies.

Authors:  Anja Hilbert; Claudia Hübner; Gabriele Schmutzer; Sigrun Danielsdottir; Elmar Brähler; Rebecca Puhl
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  Perceived weight discrimination in England: a population-based study of adults aged ⩾50 years.

Authors:  S E Jackson; A Steptoe; R J Beeken; H Croker; J Wardle
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Homeostatic theory of obesity.

Authors:  David F Marks
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2015-06-29

10.  Does weight-related stigmatisation and discrimination depend on educational attainment and level of income? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Bernard; Thomas Fankhänel; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Claudia Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.