Jaime M Preussler1, Stephanie H Farnia1, Ellen M Denzen1, Navneet S Majhail2. 1. National Marrow Donor Program; and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN. 2. National Marrow Donor Program; and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN nmajhail@nmdp.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Variation in Medicaid policies among states may lead to differences in coverage for complex treatments. This article uses hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), an established treatment for patients with hematologic cancers, as a case study to highlight state variation in Medicaid coverage of complex oncology treatments. METHODS: Information on HCT coverage benefits for 2012 was collected from state Medicaid Web sites and was compared with recommended HCT benefits developed by multiple stakeholders. Coverage was reviewed for five categories: one, transplantation procedure; two, donor search; three, prescriptions; four, clinical trials; and five, patient food, lodging, and transportation. Coverage was coded on a three-point scale for each category for each state. States were ranked by the number of variables for which they met recommended benefits criteria (maximum rank score, 5). RESULTS: Detailed information on Medicaid coverage was available for 47 states. No state provided the recommended coverage benefits in all five categories. Prescription coverage most often met the recommended criteria, whereas only a small number of states provided clinical trial coverage for HCT. There was substantial variation in Medicaid coverage for HCT by state. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight substantial variation in Medicaid coverage for HCT by state, which may increase disparities in access for already medically underserved populations.
PURPOSE: Variation in Medicaid policies among states may lead to differences in coverage for complex treatments. This article uses hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), an established treatment for patients with hematologic cancers, as a case study to highlight state variation in Medicaid coverage of complex oncology treatments. METHODS: Information on HCT coverage benefits for 2012 was collected from state Medicaid Web sites and was compared with recommended HCT benefits developed by multiple stakeholders. Coverage was reviewed for five categories: one, transplantation procedure; two, donor search; three, prescriptions; four, clinical trials; and five, patient food, lodging, and transportation. Coverage was coded on a three-point scale for each category for each state. States were ranked by the number of variables for which they met recommended benefits criteria (maximum rank score, 5). RESULTS: Detailed information on Medicaid coverage was available for 47 states. No state provided the recommended coverage benefits in all five categories. Prescription coverage most often met the recommended criteria, whereas only a small number of states provided clinical trial coverage for HCT. There was substantial variation in Medicaid coverage for HCT by state. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight substantial variation in Medicaid coverage for HCT by state, which may increase disparities in access for already medically underserved populations.
Authors: Alois Gratwohl; Helen Baldomero; Mahmoud Aljurf; Marcelo C Pasquini; Luis Fernando Bouzas; Ayami Yoshimi; Jeff Szer; Jeff Lipton; Alvin Schwendener; Michael Gratwohl; Karl Frauendorfer; Dietger Niederwieser; Mary Horowitz; Yoshihisa Kodera Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sherif S Farag; Kati Maharry; Mei-Jie Zhang; Waleska S Pérez; Stephen L George; Krzysztof Mrózek; John DiPersio; Donald W Bunjes; Guido Marcucci; Maria R Baer; Mitchell Cairo; Edward Copelan; Corey S Cutler; Luis Isola; Hillard M Lazarus; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Olle Ringdén; David A Rizzieri; Robert Soiffer; Richard A Larson; Martin S Tallman; Clara D Bloomfield; Daniel J Weisdorf Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Navneet S Majhail; Elizabeth A Murphy; Nancy A Omondi; Pam Robinett; James L Gajewski; C Fred LeMaistre; Dennis Confer; J Douglas Rizzo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Navneet S Majhail; Nancy A Omondi; Ellen Denzen; Elizabeth A Murphy; J Douglas Rizzo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-12-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jaime M Preussler; Lih-Wen Mau; Navneet S Majhail; Margaret Bevans; Emilie Clancy; Carolyn Messner; Leslie Parran; Kate A Pederson; Stacy Stickney Ferguson; Kent Walters; Elizabeth A Murphy; Ellen M Denzen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kelsey L Besse; Jaime M Preussler; Elizabeth A Murphy; Ellen M Denzen; Michael C Lill; Jeffrey W Chell; Mary K Senneka; Navneet S Majhail; Eric P Williams Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Joseph M Unger; Charles D Blanke; Michael LeBlanc; William E Barlow; Riha Vaidya; Scott D Ramsey; Dawn L Hershman Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-04-01
Authors: Colin Flannelly; Bryan E-Xin Tan; Jian Liang Tan; Colin M McHugh; Chandrika Sanapala; Tara Lagu; Jane L Liesveld; Omar Aljitawi; Michael W Becker; Jason H Mendler; Heidi D Klepin; Wendy Stock; Tanya M Wildes; Andrew Artz; Navneet S Majhail; Kah Poh Loh Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 5.609