Annette Erichsen Andersson1, Max Petzold2, Ingrid Bergh3, Jón Karlsson4, Bengt I Eriksson4, Kerstin Nilsson5. 1. The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Anesthesia, Surgery, and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: annette.erichsen@vgregion.se. 2. Akademistatistik - Centre for Applied Biostatistics, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. School of Life Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden. 4. Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 5. The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of laminar airflow systems in operating rooms as protection from surgical site infections has been questioned. The aim of our study was to explore the differences in air contamination rates between displacement ventilation and laminar airflow systems during planned and acute orthopedic implant surgery. A second aim was to compare the influence of the number of people present, the reasons for traffic flow, and the door-opening rates between the 2 systems. METHODS: Active air sampling and observations were made during 63 orthopedic implant operations. RESULTS: The laminar airflow system resulted in a reduction of 89% in colony forming units in comparison with the displacement system (P < .001). The air samples taken in the preparation rooms showed high levels of bacterial growth (≈ 40 CFU/m(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that laminar airflow-ventilated operating rooms offer high-quality air during surgery, with very low levels of colony forming units close to the surgical wound. The continuous maintenance of laminar air flow and other technical systems are crucial, because minor failures in complex systems like those in operating rooms can result in a detrimental effect on air quality and jeopardize the safety of patients. The technical ventilation solutions are important, but they do not guarantee clean air, because many other factors, such as the organization of the work and staff behavior, influence air cleanliness.
BACKGROUND: The importance of laminar airflow systems in operating rooms as protection from surgical site infections has been questioned. The aim of our study was to explore the differences in air contamination rates between displacement ventilation and laminar airflow systems during planned and acute orthopedic implant surgery. A second aim was to compare the influence of the number of people present, the reasons for traffic flow, and the door-opening rates between the 2 systems. METHODS: Active air sampling and observations were made during 63 orthopedic implant operations. RESULTS: The laminar airflow system resulted in a reduction of 89% in colony forming units in comparison with the displacement system (P < .001). The air samples taken in the preparation rooms showed high levels of bacterial growth (≈ 40 CFU/m(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that laminar airflow-ventilated operating rooms offer high-quality air during surgery, with very low levels of colony forming units close to the surgical wound. The continuous maintenance of laminar air flow and other technical systems are crucial, because minor failures in complex systems like those in operating rooms can result in a detrimental effect on air quality and jeopardize the safety of patients. The technical ventilation solutions are important, but they do not guarantee clean air, because many other factors, such as the organization of the work and staff behavior, influence air cleanliness.
Authors: Francesco Romano; Jan Gustén; Stefano De Antonellis; Cesare M Joppolo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cesira Pasquarella; Carla Balocco; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Elisa Saccani; Samuel Paroni; Lara Albertini; Pietro Vitali; Roberto Albertini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Norbert Harrasser; Johannes Gorkotte; Andreas Obermeier; Susanne Feihl; Melanie Straub; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Walter Moser; Philipp Gruner; Michael de Wild; Hans Gollwitzer; Rainer Burgkart Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 2.362