Literature DB >> 24713277

Breast cancer screening halves the risk of breast cancer death: a case-referent study.

Ellen Paap1, André L M Verbeek2, Anita A M Botterweck3, Heidi J van Doorne-Nagtegaal3, Mechli Imhof-Tas4, Harry J de Koning5, Suzie J Otto5, Linda de Munck3, Annemieke van der Steen6, Roland Holland7, Gerard J den Heeten8, Mireille J M Broeders9.   

Abstract

Large-scale epidemiologic studies have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of mammographic screening programs, however the benefits are still subject to debate. We estimated the effect of the Dutch screening program on breast cancer mortality. In a large multi-region case-referent study, we identified all breast cancer deaths in 2004 and 2005 in women aged 50-75 who had been invited for screening (cases). Cases were individually matched to referents from the population invited to screening. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer death according to individual screening history. The OR was adjusted for self-selection bias using regional correction factors for the difference in baseline risk for breast cancer death between screened and unscreened women. A total of 1233 cases and 2090 referents were included in this study. We found a 58% reduction in breast cancer mortality in screened versus unscreened women (adjusted OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53). Screening, i.e. early detection and treatment, has resulted in a substantial reduction in breast cancer mortality, indicating that the Dutch breast cancer screening program is highly effective.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Case-referent study; Effectiveness; Mammography; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24713277     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  7 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Screening Paved with Good Intentions: Application of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model to Racial/Ethnic Minority Women.

Authors:  Costellia H Talley; Lihong Yang; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-12

Review 2.  Effects of age on the detection and management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew McGuire; James A L Brown; Carmel Malone; Ray McLaughlin; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.

Authors:  Stephen Morrell; Richard Taylor; David Roder; Bridget Robson; Marli Gregory; Kirsty Craig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Breast cancer in Mongolia: an increasingly important health policy issue.

Authors:  Delgermaa Demchig; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Dose and spatial resolution analysis of grating-based phase-contrast mammography using an inverse Compton x-ray source.

Authors:  Lisa Heck; Elena Eggl; Susanne Grandl; Martin Dierolf; Christoph Jud; Benedikt Günther; Klaus Achterhold; Doris Mayr; Bernhard Gleich; Karin Hellerhoff; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  The potential of breast cancer screening in Europe.

Authors:  Nadine Zielonke; Lindy M Kregting; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Piret Veerus; Sirpa Heinävaara; Martin McKee; Inge M C M de Kok; Harry J de Koning; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Serum N-glycan profiles differ for various breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Gerda C M Vreeker; Kiki M H Vangangelt; Marco R Bladergroen; Simone Nicolardi; Wilma E Mesker; Manfred Wuhrer; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Rob A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.916

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.