Literature DB >> 24711493

Hopkinson bar techniques for the intermediate strain rate testing of bovine cortical bone.

T J Cloete1, G Paul, E B Ismail.   

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of the dynamic viscoelastic properties of bone is required to understand the mechanisms of macroscopic bone fracture in humans, and other terrestrial mammals, during impact loading events (e.g. falls, vehicle accidents, etc.). While the dynamic response of bone has been studied for several decades, high-quality data remain limited, and it is only within the last decade that techniques for conducting dynamic compression tests on bone at near-constant strain rates have been developed. Furthermore, there appears to be a lack of published bone data in the intermediate strain rate (ISR) range (i.e. 1-100 s(-1)), which represents a regime in which many dynamic bone fractures occur. In this paper, preliminary results for the dynamic compression of bovine cortical bone in the ISR regime are presented. The results are obtained using two Hopkinson-bar-related techniques, namely the conventional split Hopkinson bar arrangement incorporating a novel cone-in-tube striker design, and the recently developed wedge bar apparatus. The experimental results show a rapid transition in the strain rate sensitive behaviour of bovine cortical bone in the ISR range. Finally, a new viscoelastic model is proposed that captures the observed transition behaviour.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hopkinson bar; bovine cortical bone; constitutive model; intermediate strain rate; viscoelasticity; wedge bar

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711493      PMCID: PMC3982653          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  7 in total

1.  A viscoelastic, viscoplastic model of cortical bone valid at low and high strain rates.

Authors:  T P M Johnson; S Socrate; M C Boyce
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Hydraulic strengthening affects the stiffness and strength of cortical bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Tony S Keller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Bone strength: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  K Shawn Davison; Kerry Siminoski; J D Adachi; David A Hanley; David Goltzman; Anthony B Hodsman; Robert Josse; Stephanie Kaiser; Wojciech P Olszynski; Alexandra Papaioannou; Louis-George Ste-Marie; David L Kendler; Alan Tenenhouse; Jacques P Brown
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue.

Authors:  J H McElhaney
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 7.  Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.813

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.