Literature DB >> 16887465

Bone strength: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

K Shawn Davison1, Kerry Siminoski, J D Adachi, David A Hanley, David Goltzman, Anthony B Hodsman, Robert Josse, Stephanie Kaiser, Wojciech P Olszynski, Alexandra Papaioannou, Louis-George Ste-Marie, David L Kendler, Alan Tenenhouse, Jacques P Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current knowledge regarding the various determinants of bone strength.
METHODS: Relevant English-language articles acquired from Medline from 1966 up to January 2005 were reviewed. Searches included the keywords bone AND 1 of the following: strength, remodeling, microcrack, structur*, mineralization, collagen, organic, crystallinity, osteocyte, porosity, diameter, anisotropy, stress risers, or connectivity. Abstracts from applicable conference proceedings were also reviewed for pertinent information.
RESULTS: Bone strength is determined from both its material and its structural properties. Material properties such as its degree of mineralization, crystallinity, collagen characteristics, and osteocyte viability have substantial impacts on bone strength. Structural properties such as the diameter and thickness of the cortices, the porosity of the cortical shell, the connectivity and anisotropy of the trabecular network, the thickness of trabeculae, and the presence of trabecular stress risers and microcracks impact bone strength in diverse manners. Remodeling activity either directly or indirectly impacts all of these processes.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone strength is dependent on numerous, interrelated factors. Remodeling activity has a direct impact on almost all of the components of bone strength and requires further investigation as to its impact on these factors in isolation and in unison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16887465     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  47 in total

1.  Low urine pH and acid excretion do not predict bone fractures or the loss of bone mineral density: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Misha Eliasziw; Suzanne C Tough; Andrew W Lyon; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  The influence of follistatin on mechanical properties of bone tissue in growing mice with overexpression of follistatin.

Authors:  Anna Gajos-Michniewicz; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Tomasz Ochedalski; Agnieszka Piastowska-Ciesielska
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Skeletal outcomes by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  A D DiVasta; H A Feldman; J M O'Donnell; J Long; M B Leonard; C M Gordon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Resolution dependence of the non-metric trabecular structure indices.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Robert A Nissenson; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Is bone quality associated with collagen age?

Authors:  D J Leeming; K Henriksen; I Byrjalsen; P Qvist; S H Madsen; P Garnero; M A Karsdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparative bone anatomy of commonly used laboratory animals: implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  Cedo M Bagi; Edwin Berryman; Maria R Moalli
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Association of larger holes in the trabecular bone at the distal radius in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to controls.

Authors:  Janet M Pritchard; Lora M Giangregorio; Stephanie A Atkinson; Karen A Beattie; Dean Inglis; George Ioannidis; Zubin Punthakee; J D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  Acute and Stress-related Injuries of Bone and Cartilage: Pertinent Anatomy, Basic Biomechanics, and Imaging Perspective.

Authors:  Mini N Pathria; Christine B Chung; Donald L Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

Authors:  E Dall'Ara; D Pahr; P Varga; F Kainberger; P Zysset
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Phosphate decreases urine calcium and increases calcium balance: a meta-analysis of the osteoporosis acid-ash diet hypothesis.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Andrew W Lyon; Michael Eliasziw; Suzanne C Tough; David A Hanley
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.