Literature DB >> 24711134

Does intraoperative navigation assistance improve bone tumor resection and allograft reconstruction results?

Luis Aponte-Tinao1, Lucas E Ritacco, Miguel A Ayerza, D Luis Muscolo, Jose I Albergo, Germán L Farfalli, Germán L Farfall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone tumor resections for limb salvage have become standard treatment. Recently, computer-assisted navigation has been introduced to improve the accuracy of joint arthroplasty and possible tumor resection surgery; however, like with any new technology, its benefits and limitations need to be characterized for surgeons to make informed decisions about whether to use it. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wanted to (1) assess the technical problems associated with computer-assisted navigation; (2) assess the accuracy of the registration technique; (3) define the time required to perform a navigated resection in orthopedic oncology; and (4) the frequency of complications such as local recurrence, infection, nonunion, fracture, and articular collapse after tumor resection and bone reconstruction with allografts using intraoperative navigation assistance.
METHODS: We analyzed 69 consecutive patients with bone tumors of the extremities that were reconstructed with massive bone allografts using intraoperative navigation assistance with a minimum followup of 12 months (mean, 29 months; range, 12-43 months). All patients had their tumors reconstructed in three-dimensional format in a virtual platform and planning was performed to determine the osteotomy position according to oncology margins in a CT-MRI image fusion. Tumor resections and allograft reconstructions were performed using a computer navigation system according to the previously planned cuts. We analyzed intraoperative data such as technical problems related to the navigation procedure, registration technique error, length of time for the navigation procedure, and postoperative complications such as local recurrence, infection, nonunion, fracture, and articular collapse.
RESULTS: In three patients (4%), the navigation was not carried out as a result of technical problems. Of the 66 cases in which navigation was performed, the mean registration error was 0.65 mm (range, 0.3-1.2 mm). The mean required time for navigation procedures, including bone resection and allograft reconstruction during surgery, was 35 minutes (range, 18-65 minutes). Complications that required a second surgical procedure were recorded for nine patients including one local recurrence, one infection, two fractures, one articular collapse, and four nonunions. In two of these nine patients, the allograft needed to be removed. At latest followup, three patients died of their original disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The navigation procedure could not be performed for technical reasons in 4% of the series. The mean registration error was 0.65 mm in this series and the navigation procedure itself adds a mean of 35 minutes during surgery. The complications rate for this series was 14%. We found a nonunion rate of 6% in allograft reconstructions when we used a navigation system for the cuts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24711134      PMCID: PMC4317410          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3604-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Peter Loan; Vineet Sarin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Factors affecting outcome of massive intercalary bone allografts in the treatment of tumours of the femur.

Authors:  T Frisoni; L Cevolani; A Giorgini; B Dozza; D M Donati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-06

3.  Accuracy of 3-D planning and navigation in bone tumor resection.

Authors:  Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 4.  Computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Olga D Savvidou; George Mimidis; John Papanastasiou; Dimitrios Koulalis; Nikolaos Demertzis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Bone tumor resection: analysis about 3D preoperative planning and navigation method using a virtual specimen.

Authors:  Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; German L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; D L Muscolo; Fernan González Bernaldo de Quirós; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

6.  Irregular osteotomy in limb salvage for juxta-articular osteosarcoma under computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zhen Wang; Zheng Guo; Guo-Jing Chen; Ming Yang; Guo-Xian Pei
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Surgical technique: Unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite in tumor limb salvage surgery.

Authors:  Hongbin Fan; Zheng Guo; Zhen Wang; Jing Li; Xiangdong Li
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor resections.

Authors:  D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis Aponte-Tinao; Maximiliano Ranalletta; Eduardo Abalo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer-assisted tumor surgery in malignant bone tumors.

Authors:  Kwok Chuen Wong; Shekhar Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique.

Authors:  Ajay Lall; Eric Hohn; Mimi Y Kim; Richard G Gorlick; John A Abraham; David S Geller
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-12-18
View more
  13 in total

1.  Techniques in surgical navigation of extremity tumors: state of the art.

Authors:  Luis A Aponte-Tinao; Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; Miguel A Ayerza; German F Farfalli
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  What Is the Expected Learning Curve in Computer-assisted Navigation for Bone Tumor Resection?

Authors:  Germán L Farfalli; José I Albergo; Lucas E Ritacco; Miguel A Ayerza; Federico E Milano; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  From Bench to Bedside: Robotics and Navigation in Orthopaedics-Rise of the Machines or Just Rising Costs?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Creating an Intraoperative MRI Suite for the Musculoskeletal Tumor Center.

Authors:  Nathan W Mesko; David M Joyce; Hakan Ilaslan; Michael J Joyce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Is Navigation-guided En Bloc Resection Advantageous Compared With Intralesional Curettage for Locally Aggressive Bone Tumors?

Authors:  Germán L Farfalli; Jose I Albergo; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo; Lucas E Ritacco; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A novel intraoperative method to project osteotomy lines for accurate resection of primary bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Guangyu He; Amos Z Dai; Vamiq M Mustahsan; Aadit T Shah; Liming Li; Jafar A Khan; Michael R Bielski; David E Komatsu; Imin Kao; Fazel A Khan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Automatic Registration and Error Color Maps to Improve Accuracy for Navigated Bone Tumor Surgery Using Intraoperative Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Axel Sahovaler; Michael J Daly; Harley H L Chan; Prakash Nayak; Sharon Tzelnick; Michelle Arkhangorodsky; Jimmy Qiu; Robert Weersink; Jonathan C Irish; Peter Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-05-05

8.  Virtual Planning and Allograft Preparation Guided by Navigation for Reconstructive Oncologic Surgery: A Technical Report.

Authors:  Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; Domingo L Muscolo; Jose I Albergo; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-10-11

9.  The value of computer-assisted navigation for bone reconstruction after tumor resection.

Authors:  Xuejun Peng; Fengping Wang; Jing Su
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Navigation in Musculoskeletal Oncology: An Overview.

Authors:  Guy Vernon Morris; Jonathan D Stevenson; Scott Evans; Michael C Parry; Lee Jeys
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.