Literature DB >> 24710904

Wave reflection leads to over- and underestimation of local wave speed by the PU- and QA-loop methods: theoretical basis and solution to the problem.

Patrick Segers1, Abigail Swillens, Liesbeth Taelman, Jan Vierendeels.   

Abstract

Single-point methods such as the PU- and QA-loop methods are used to estimate local pulse wave velocity (PWVPU and PWVQA) in arteries from a combination of pressure (P), flow (Q), velocity (U) or cross-sectional area (A) waveforms. Available data indicate that the PU-loop method tends to overestimate PWV, while the QA-loop method tends to underestimate. Wave reflection has been suggested as a factor playing a role in the agreement between different methods. In this work, we first provide a theoretical basis to (i) demonstrate the interference of wave reflection with the PU-loop method for both solitary sinusoidal waves as well as physiological waveforms; (ii) develop an operator-independent method to correct for the presence of reflections. Fluid-structure interaction simulations in a tube and carotid artery model with known mechanical properties confirm the theory. For the carotid artery model, PWVPU severely overestimates PWV, while PWVQA underestimates PWV. Correction (leading to an estimate termed PWV1-5) seems to eliminate the impact of reflections. Finally, methods are applied in vivo. Compared to PWVPU and PWVQA, PWV1-5 leads to significantly better correlations of carotid PWV with PWV derived from carotid distensibility based on the Bramwell-Hill equation (with r(2) improving from about 0.25 to 0.91). We conclude that neither the PU-loop nor the QA-loop method provides reliable estimates of local PWV in settings where wave reflections are present-even when the PU- or QA-loops show a linear segment. They offer no alternative for the Bramwell-Hill based approach and their application should therefore be discouraged, especially for the carotid artery, although caution is probably warranted in general.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710904     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  16 in total

Review 1.  How to Measure Arterial Stiffness in Humans.

Authors:  Patrick Segers; Ernst R Rietzschel; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 2.  Pulse Waveform Analysis: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Bernhard Hametner; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Ultrasound-based Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluation in Mice.

Authors:  Nicole Di Lascio; Claudia Kusmic; Francesco Stea; Francesco Faita
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Non-invasive assessment of ventriculo-arterial coupling using aortic wave intensity analysis combining central blood pressure and phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Anish N Bhuva; A D'Silva; C Torlasco; N Nadarajan; S Jones; R Boubertakh; J Van Zalen; P Scully; K Knott; G Benedetti; J B Augusto; Rachel Bastiaenen; G Lloyd; S Sharma; J C Moon; K H Parker; C H Manisty; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  A review of wave mechanics in the pulmonary artery with an emphasis on wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  J Su; O Hilberg; L Howard; U Simonsen; A D Hughes
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 6.311

6.  Interpretation of Wave Reflections in the Umbilical Arterial Segment of the Feto-Placental Circulation: Computational Modeling of the Feto-Placental Arterial Tree.

Authors:  Rojan Saghian; Lindsay Cahill; Anum Rahman; Joseph Steinman; Greg Stortz; John Kingdom; Christopher Macgowan; John Sled
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Noninvasive pulmonary artery wave intensity analysis in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Daniel S Knight; Jennifer A Steeden; Liesbeth Taelman; Shahin Moledina; Andrew M Taylor; Patrick Segers; Gerry J Coghlan; Vivek Muthurangu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Evaluation of cerebrovascular impedance and wave reflection in mouse by ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher K Macgowan; Sarah Joy Stoops; Yu-Qing Zhou; Lindsay S Cahill; John G Sled
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Computational assessment of hemodynamics-based diagnostic tools using a database of virtual subjects: Application to three case studies.

Authors:  Marie Willemet; Samuel Vennin; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Non-invasive measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of changes in pulmonary artery stiffness with exercise.

Authors:  Omid Forouzan; Jared Warczytowa; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François; Naomi C Chesler
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.