Literature DB >> 24710150

Structural biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid within 24 h after a traumatic spinal cord injury: a descriptive analysis of 16 subjects.

M H Pouw1, B K Kwon2, M M Verbeek3, P E Vos4, A van Kampen1, C G Fisher2, J Street2, S J Paquette2, M F Dvorak2, M C Boyd2, A J F Hosman1, H van de Meent5.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron specific enolase (NSE), S-100β, tau and neurofilament heavy chain (NFH) within 24 h of an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and to correlate these concentrations with the baseline severity of neurologic impairment as graded by the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS).
METHODS: A lumbar puncture was performed to obtain CSF from 16 acute traumatic SCI patients within 24 h post injury. Neurological examinations were performed within 24 h of injury and again at 6 or 12 months post injury. The correlations between the CSF concentrations and initial AIS were calculated by using Pearson correlation coefficients. In addition, an independent Student's t-test was used to test for differences in CSF concentrations between patients of different AIS grades.
RESULTS: The CSF NSE concentrations were significantly correlated with the baseline neurologic impairment being either 'motor complete' (AIS A, B) or 'motor incomplete' (AIS C, D) (r=0.520, P<0.05). The mean S-100β concentration in motor complete patients was significantly higher compared with motor incomplete patients; 377.2 μg l(-1) (s.d.±523 μg l(-1)) vs 57.1 μg l(-1) (s.d.±56 μg l(-1)) (P<0.05), respectively. Lastly, the mean NFH concentration in motor complete patients was significantly higher compared with motor incomplete patient, 11 813 ng l(-1) (s.d.±16 195 ng l(-1)) vs 1446.8 ng l(-1) (s.d.±1533 ng l(-1)), (P<0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this study we identified differences in the structural CSF biomarkers NSE, S-100β and NFH between motor complete and motor incomplete SCI patients. Our data showed no clear differences in any of the protein concentrations between the different AIS grades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710150     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  25 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: from Prognosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Leonardo Fonseca Rodrigues; Vivaldo Moura-Neto; Tania Cristina Leite de Sampaio E Spohr
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Nanoparticle Estrogen in Rat Spinal Cord Injury Elicits Rapid Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Tissue.

Authors:  April Cox; Abhay Varma; John Barry; Alexey Vertegel; Naren Banik
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Exosome-mediated inflammasome signaling after central nervous system injury.

Authors:  Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari; Frank Brand; Stephanie Adamczak; Stephanie W Lee; Jon Perez-Barcena; Michael Y Wang; M Ross Bullock; W Dalton Dietrich; Robert W Keane
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 4.  The developing landscape of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood.

Authors:  C H Hulme; S J Brown; H R Fuller; J Riddell; A Osman; J Chowdhury; N Kumar; W E Johnson; K T Wright
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Neurochemical biomarkers in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Ona Bloom; Ina-Beate Wanner; Armin Curt; Jan M Schwab; James Fawcett; Kevin K Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Axonal damage is remarkable in patients with acutely worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy: biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid samples.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takahashi; Yasuchika Aoki; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Fumiaki Terajima; Masahiko Saito; Takuya Miyamoto; Keita Koyama; Keiichiro Yamamoto; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Seiji Ohtori; Masashi Yamazaki; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Protection and Repair After Spinal Cord Injury: Accomplishments and Future Directions.

Authors:  W Dalton Dietrich
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-12

8.  Spinal cord injury and Alzheimer's disease risk: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tian-Shin Yeh; Yu-Chun Ho; Cherng-Lan Hsu; Shin-Liang Pan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  The Next Generation of Biomarker Research in Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Elke Ydens; Ilse Palmers; Sven Hendrix; Veerle Somers
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  Neuron specific enolase: a promising therapeutic target in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Azizul Haque; Swapan K Ray; April Cox; Naren L Banik
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.