Rianne Van der Zanden1, Keshia Curie2, Monique Van Londen3, Jeannet Kramer4, Gerard Steen5, Pim Cuijpers6. 1. Trimbos Institute, Knowledge Centre of Mental Health and Addiction, Da Costakade 45, Post Office Box 727, 3500 Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rzanden@trimbos.nl. 2. Trimbos Institute, Knowledge Centre of Mental Health and Addiction, Da Costakade 45, Post Office Box 727, 3500 Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: keshiacurie@yahoo.com. 3. Department of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.vanlonden@uu.nl. 4. Trimbos Institute, Knowledge Centre of Mental Health and Addiction, Da Costakade 45, Post Office Box 727, 3500 Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Language and Communication, Network Institute, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.j.steen@vu.nl. 6. Department of Clinical Psychology, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.cijpers@vu.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The growing number of web-based psychological treatments, based on textual communication, generates a wealth of data that can contribute to knowledge of online and face-to-face treatments. We investigated whether clients' language use predicted treatment outcomes and adherence in Master Your Mood (MYM), an online group course for young adults with depressive symptoms. METHODS: Among 234 participants from a randomised controlled trial of MYM, we tested whether their word use on course application forms predicted baseline levels of depression, anxiety and mastery, or subsequent treatment adherence. We then analysed chat session transcripts of course completers (n=67) to investigate whether word use changes predicted changes in treatment outcomes. RESULTS:Depression improvement was predicted by increasing use of 'discrepancy words' during treatment (e.g. should). At baseline, more discrepancy words predicted higher mastery level. Adherence was predicted by more words used at application, more social words and fewer discrepancy words. LIMITATIONS: Many variables were included, increasing the chance of coincidental results. This risk was constrained by examining only those word categories that have been investigated in relation to depression or adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to link word use during treatment to outcomes of treatment that has proven to be effective in an RCT. The results suggest that paying attention to the length of problem articulation at application and to 'discrepancy words' may be wise, as these seem to be psychological markers. To expand knowledge of word use as psychological marker, research on web-based treatment should include text analysis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The growing number of web-based psychological treatments, based on textual communication, generates a wealth of data that can contribute to knowledge of online and face-to-face treatments. We investigated whether clients' language use predicted treatment outcomes and adherence in Master Your Mood (MYM), an online group course for young adults with depressive symptoms. METHODS: Among 234 participants from a randomised controlled trial of MYM, we tested whether their word use on course application forms predicted baseline levels of depression, anxiety and mastery, or subsequent treatment adherence. We then analysed chat session transcripts of course completers (n=67) to investigate whether word use changes predicted changes in treatment outcomes. RESULTS:Depression improvement was predicted by increasing use of 'discrepancy words' during treatment (e.g. should). At baseline, more discrepancy words predicted higher mastery level. Adherence was predicted by more words used at application, more social words and fewer discrepancy words. LIMITATIONS: Many variables were included, increasing the chance of coincidental results. This risk was constrained by examining only those word categories that have been investigated in relation to depression or adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to link word use during treatment to outcomes of treatment that has proven to be effective in an RCT. The results suggest that paying attention to the length of problem articulation at application and to 'discrepancy words' may be wise, as these seem to be psychological markers. To expand knowledge of word use as psychological marker, research on web-based treatment should include text analysis.
Authors: Mark Hoogendoorn; Thomas Berger; Ava Schulz; Timo Stolz; Peter Szolovits Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Lori Wozney; Anna Huguet; Kathryn Bennett; Ashley D Radomski; Lisa Hartling; Michele Dyson; Amanda S Newton; Patrick J McGrath Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Joelle N Soucy; Heather D Hadjistavropoulos; Catherine A Couture; Victoria A M Owens; Blake F Dear; Nickolai Titov Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2018-02-01
Authors: Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura; Sergio Gonzales; Juandiego Morzan; Hugo Alatrista-Salas; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Jiang Bian Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 7.011
Authors: John Wallert; Emelie Gustafson; Claes Held; Guy Madison; Fredrika Norlund; Louise von Essen; Erik Martin Gustaf Olsson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 5.428