Ronald D Alvarez1, Michael W Sill2, Susan A Davidson3, Carolyn Y Muller4, David P Bender5, Robert L DeBernardo6, Kian Behbakht3, Warner K Huh7. 1. Dept. of OB/GYN, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333, USA. Electronic address: rdalvarez@uab.edu. 2. Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. 3. Dept. of OB/GYN, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. 4. Dept. of OB/GYN, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. 5. Dept. of OB/GYN, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. 6. Dept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 7. Dept. of OB/GYN, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the toxicity and antitumor activity of EGEN-001 in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had weekly IP infusion of EGEN-001 at a dose of 24mg/m(2). Toxicity and antitumor activity were evaluated using CTCAE and RESIST criteria, respectively. Co-primary endpoints were tumor response and survival without progression (PFS) for at least 6months. Survival without progression before going onto a subsequent therapy (EFS) for at least six months was also considered. RESULTS: A total of 58 EGEN-001 cycles were administered to 20/22 enrolled patients (median 2cycles, range 1-9). The most frequently associated adverse events related specifically to EGEN-001 treatment were grade 1/2 fatigue, fever, chills, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Three of 20 EGEN-001 treated patients evaluable for toxicity elected to withdraw from the study motivated in part by grade 1 treatment related toxicities. There were no patients with partial or complete response (0%; 90% CI 0-10.9%). Seven (35%) of 16 patients evaluable for response had stable disease, and 9 (45%) had progressive disease. Six (30%) patients had a PFS of greater than six months, although three had gone off study and onto other therapies before six months. The estimated six-month EFS was 15%. The median PFS and OS were 2.89 and 9.17months, respectively. CONCLUSION: EGEN-001 at the dose and schedule evaluated was associated with some but limited activity and was seemingly less tolerated in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the toxicity and antitumor activity of EGEN-001 in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had weekly IP infusion of EGEN-001 at a dose of 24mg/m(2). Toxicity and antitumor activity were evaluated using CTCAE and RESIST criteria, respectively. Co-primary endpoints were tumor response and survival without progression (PFS) for at least 6months. Survival without progression before going onto a subsequent therapy (EFS) for at least six months was also considered. RESULTS: A total of 58 EGEN-001 cycles were administered to 20/22 enrolled patients (median 2cycles, range 1-9). The most frequently associated adverse events related specifically to EGEN-001 treatment were grade 1/2 fatigue, fever, chills, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Three of 20 EGEN-001 treated patients evaluable for toxicity elected to withdraw from the study motivated in part by grade 1 treatment related toxicities. There were no patients with partial or complete response (0%; 90% CI 0-10.9%). Seven (35%) of 16 patients evaluable for response had stable disease, and 9 (45%) had progressive disease. Six (30%) patients had a PFS of greater than six months, although three had gone off study and onto other therapies before six months. The estimated six-month EFS was 15%. The median PFS and OS were 2.89 and 9.17months, respectively. CONCLUSION:EGEN-001 at the dose and schedule evaluated was associated with some but limited activity and was seemingly less tolerated in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancerpatients.
Authors: D G Duda; M Sunamura; L Lozonschi; T Kodama; S Egawa; G Matsumoto; H Shimamura; K Shibuya; K Takeda; S Matsuno Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jason G Fewell; Majed Matar; Gregory Slobodkin; Sang-Oh Han; Jennifer Rice; Bruce Hovanes; Danny H Lewis; Khursheed Anwer Journal: J Control Release Date: 2005-11-02 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: R Zagozdzon; J Gołab; T Stokłosa; A Giermasz; D Nowicka; W Feleszko; W Lasek; M Jakóbisiak Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1998-08-31 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Peter Ujhazy; Gintaras Zaleskis; Enrico Mihich; M Jane Ehrke; Erica S Berleth Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Jason G Fewell; Majed M Matar; Jennifer S Rice; Elaine Brunhoeber; Gregory Slobodkin; Casey Pence; Miranda Worker; Danny H Lewis; Khursheed Anwer Journal: J Gene Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.565
Authors: Ioannis Alagkiozidis; Andrea Facciabene; Carmine Carpenito; Fabian Benencia; Zdenka Jonak; Sarah Adams; Richard G Carroll; Phyllis A Gimotty; Rachel Hammond; Gwen-äel Danet-Desnoyers; Carl H June; Daniel J Powell; George Coukos Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Renato Lenzi; Robert Edwards; Carl June; Michael V Seiden; Michael E Garcia; Michael Rosenblum; Ralph S Freedman Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2007-12-12 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Premal H Thaker; William E Brady; Heather A Lankes; Kunle Odunsi; William H Bradley; Kathleen N Moore; Carolyn Y Muller; Khursheed Anwer; Russell J Schilder; Ronald D Alvarez; Paula M Fracasso Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: S Tugues; S H Burkhard; I Ohs; M Vrohlings; K Nussbaum; J Vom Berg; P Kulig; B Becher Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Emily M Cheng; Noah W Tsarovsky; Paul M Sondel; Alexander L Rakhmilevich Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 6.630
Authors: Khue G Nguyen; Maura R Vrabel; Siena M Mantooth; Jared J Hopkins; Ethan S Wagner; Taylor A Gabaldon; David A Zaharoff Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 7.561