Literature DB >> 24706955

Determination of space use by laying hens using kinematic analysis.

Joy A Mench1, Richard A Blatchford.   

Abstract

Two states in the United States now have legislation requiring that laying hens be provided with sufficient space to perform particular behaviors. To provide a framework for translating these performance standards into a space requirement, kinematic analysis was used to measure the amount of space needed for White Leghorn hens to stand, turn around 180°, lie down, and wing flap. Hyline W-36 hens (n = 9) were marked on the tops of their heads and the tips of both wings and 3 toes with black livestock marker. Each hen was then placed in a floor pen (91.4 × 91.4 cm) and filmed using 2 high-speed cameras. The resulting images were processed using a software program that generated 3-dimensional space use for each behavior. Because none of the hens lay down in the test pen, the 2-dimensional space required for lying was determined by superimposing a grid over videos of the hens lying down in their home cages. On average, hens required a mean area of 563 (± 8) cm(2) to stand, 1,316 (± 23) cm(2) to turn around, 318 (± 6) cm(2) to lie down, and 1,693 (± 136) cm(2) to wing flap. The mean heights used were 34.8 (± 1.3) cm for standing, 38.6 (± 2.3) cm for turning, and 49.5 (± 1.8) cm for wing flapping. However, space requirements for hens housed in multiple-hen groups in cage or noncage systems cannot be based simply on information about the space required for local movement by a single hen. It must also incorporate consideration of the tendency of hens in a flock to synchronize their behaviors. In addition, it must include not just local movement space but also the space that hens may need to use for longer-distance movements to access resources such as food, water, perches, and nest boxes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; kinematics; laying hen; movement; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706955     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Malcolm Mitchell; Leonardo James Vinco; Eva Voslarova; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Antonio Velarde
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Technology and Poultry Welfare.

Authors:  Neila Ben Sassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Nest use and patterns of egg laying and damage by 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  S Villanueva; A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Opportunities for exercise during pullet rearing, Part II: Long-term effects on bone characteristics of adult laying hens at the end-of-lay.

Authors:  T M Casey-Trott; D R Korver; M T Guerin; V Sandilands; S Torrey; T M Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Dust bathing in laying hens: strain, proximity to, and number of conspecifics matter.

Authors:  Tessa C Grebey; Ahmed B A Ali; Janice C Swanson; Tina M Widowski; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system.

Authors:  Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.