| Literature DB >> 24706600 |
Ralfo G Pacchioni1, Fabíola M Carvalho, Claudia E Thompson, André L F Faustino, Fernanda Nicolini, Tatiana S Pereira, Rita C B Silva, Mauricio E Cantão, Alexandra Gerber, Ana T R Vasconcelos, Lucymara F Agnez-Lima.
Abstract
Although microorganisms play crucial roles in ecosystems, metagenomic analyses of soil samples are quite scarce, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. In this work, the microbial diversity of soil samples from an Atlantic Forest and Caatinga was analyzed using a metagenomic approach. Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla in both samples. Among which, a significant proportion of stress-resistant bacteria associated to organic matter degradation was found. Sequences related to metabolism of amino acids, nitrogen, and DNA and stress resistance were more frequent in Caatinga soil, while the forest sample showed the highest occurrence of hits annotated in phosphorous metabolism, defense mechanisms, and aromatic compound degradation subsystems. The principal component analysis (PCA) showed that our samples are close to the desert metagenomes in relation to taxonomy, but are more similar to rhizosphere microbiota in relation to the functional profiles. The data indicate that soil characteristics affect the taxonomic and functional distribution; these characteristics include low nutrient content, high drainage (both are sandy soils), vegetation, and exposure to stress. In both samples, a rapid turnover of organic matter with low greenhouse gas emission was suggested by the functional profiles obtained, reinforcing the importance of preserving natural areas.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic forest; bioinformatic; caatinga; comparative metagenomics; pyrosequencing.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24706600 PMCID: PMC4082704 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
General features of the studied areas
| Parque das Dunas (PD) | João Câmara (JC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biome | Atlantic forest | Caatinga |
| Climate zone | Humid tropical | Semiarid |
| Temperature (annual average) | 22.6–29.2°C | 21–32°C |
| UV | High, but indirect due to canopy | High and direct |
| Rainfall (annual average) | 1600 mm | 648 mm |
| Vegetation | Predominantly arboreal, also presenting shrubs and herbaceous. The main families found are Leguminosae, Myrtaceae, Gramineae (Poaceae), Compositae, Euphorbiaceae, Convolvulaceae, and Rubiaceae (Freire | Xerophilous species, shrubs, thorny and deciduous small trees (Santos et al. |
| Soil | Low compaction, sandy, grayish | Compact, dry, dark brown, with few roots |
Organic and physical–chemical parameters of PD and JC soil samples
| Ca | Mg | Al | H + Al | P | K | Na | N | Organic matter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | Mg | Al | H + Al | P | K | Na | N | Organic matter | |||
| Sample | pH in water | (cmol.dm−3) | (mg.dm−3) | (g.dm−3) | C:N | ||||||
| PD | 4.99 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 1.32 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 0.31 | 11.26 | 21:1 |
| JC | 4.60 | 9.5 | 23.5 | 2.25 | 7.76 | 4 | 305 | 199 | 1.10 | 24.6 | 12.7:1 |
Taxonomic profile of PD and JC samples to domain level, computed by MEGAN and MG-RAST
| Domain | MEGAN | MG-RAST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | JC | PD | JC | |
| Archaea | 266 | 662 | 232 | 366 |
| Bacteria | 88,786 | 106,396 | 74,299 | 93,371 |
| Eukaryota | 7489 | 794 | 5312 | 701 |
| Viruses | 11 | 25 | 5 | 21 |
Differences statistically significant between PD and JC samples (P < 1e−15) by STAMP.
Figure 1Comparative taxonomic profile of the PD and JC samples at class level, computed by MG-RAST. Classes with significant biological differences (P < 0.05, difference between the proportions >1% and twofold of ratio between the proportions, STAMP) for the Bacteria domain (A); for the Archaea domain (B); and for the Eukaryota domain (C).
Figure 2Comparative taxonomic profile of the PD and JC samples at genus level, computed by MG-RAST (A) and MEGAN (B). The twenty most abundant genera found in each samples are shown. *Significant differences between PD and JC samples (P < 0.05, difference between the proportions >1% and twofold of ratio between the proportions).
Figure 3Trends in the PD and JC taxonomy for the class level (A) and for SEED subsystems at level 1 (B) examined using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) through the STAMP software, based on multiple group analysis, applying ANOVA test, Games–Howell post hoc test for confidence interval method and Benjamin–Hochberg FDR for correction.
Figure 4Comparison computed using two group analysis at class taxonomic level for PD and JC versus deserts (A) and PD and JC versus rhizospheres (B). The Welch′s t-test, the Welch′s inverted test for confidence interval method and Benjamin–Hochberg FDR for correction were applied. Data related to relative frequency. Significant differences were not observed.
Figure 5Comparison computed using two groups analysis at genus level for PD and JC versus deserts (A). The significant genera are shown in (B). Genera with difference of relative frequency between PD and JC versus desert (C). The Welch′s t-test, the Welch′s inverted test for confidence interval method and Benjamin–Hochberg FDR for correction were applied.
Figure 6Comparative functional profile of PD (in black) and JC (in gray) samples identified by MG-RAST and statistically analyzed by STAMP. (A) Subsystems at level 1 (*P < 0.05). (B) Subsystems at level 2 (P < 0.05, difference between the proportions >1% and a twofold ratio between the proportions). (C) Abundance of subsystems at level 3.
Figure 7Nitrogen (A) and Methane (B) metabolic pathways performed by KEGG mapper from MG-RAST, with the hit number obtained for each EC number in relation to PD (blue) and JC (red) (adapted by Kanehisa – http://www.genome.jp/kegg).
Figure 8Comparison between PD and JC samples for key enzymes coding genes of distinct metabolic pathways: Carbon Fixation (abfD, cbbQ, cbbO, cbbX, cbbR), Sulfate Respiration (dsrA), Nitrate Respiration (nirK, nirS, narG, narH, napA, napB, napC, nosZ), Nitrogen Fixation (fixA, fixB, fixC, nifA, nifH), CO Oxidation (coxL, coxM, coxS), Acidity Resistance (idhD, atpA, aldB, cfA, groEL, pstS, phoBDRSU), Virulence and Pathogenicity (katG, aroG, ohr, cpkA, prfA, palFA, sdh1, mpg1, pth11, acr1, ace1, pelA, cut1, pth3, pth8, pkS1-15, tri5, fsr1, magB, mgv1, mps1, pmk1), Chemotaxis and Quorum sensing (pilG, pilH, pilJ), Biofilm (hnsP), and Secretion Systems (TIII Type – escV, pscJ, fliI, flhA/TIV Type – virB4, virB11, cpaF).