Literature DB >> 24706395

Encoding and retrieval of landmark-related spatial cues during navigation: an fMRI study.

Joost Wegman1, Anna Tyborowska, Gabriele Janzen.   

Abstract

To successfully navigate, humans can use different cues from their surroundings. Learning locations in an environment can be supported by parallel subsystems in the hippocampus and the striatum. We used fMRI to look at differences in the use of object-related spatial cues while 47 participants actively navigated in an open-field virtual environment. In each trial, participants navigated toward a target object. During encoding, three positional cues (columns) with directional cues (shadows) were available. During retrieval, the removed target had to be replaced while either two objects without shadows (objects trial) or one object with a shadow (shadow trial) were available. Participants were informed in blocks about which type of retrieval trial was most likely to occur, thereby modulating expectations of having to rely on a single landmark or on a configuration of landmarks. How the spatial learning systems in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus were involved in these landmark-based encoding and retrieval processes were investigated. Landmark configurations can create a geometry similar to boundaries in an environment. It was found that the hippocampus was involved in encoding when relying on configurations of landmarks, whereas the caudate nucleus was involved in encoding when relying on single landmarks. This might suggest that the observed hippocampal activation for configurations of objects is linked to a spatial representation observed with environmental boundaries. Retrieval based on configurations of landmarks activated regions associated with the spatial updation of object locations for reorientation. When only a single landmark was available during retrieval, regions associated with updating the location of oneself were activated. There was also evidence that good between-participant performance was predicted by right hippocampal activation. This study therefore sheds light on how the brain deals with changing demands on spatial processing related purely to landmarks.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caudate nucleus; fMRI; hippocampus; landmark; navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706395     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  9 in total

1.  Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation.

Authors:  Marcia Bécu; Denis Sheynikhovich; Guillaume Tatur; Catherine Persephone Agathos; Luca Leonardo Bologna; José-Alain Sahel; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-09-23

2.  Hippocampal volume reduction in female but not male recent abstinent methamphetamine users.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Meina Quan; Wenxu Zhuang; Na Zhong; Haifeng Jiang; David N Kennedy; Amy Harrington; Douglas Ziedonis; Xiaoduo Fan; Min Zhao
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults.

Authors:  Jennifer T Sneider; Derek A Hamilton; Julia E Cohen-Gilbert; David J Crowley; Isabelle M Rosso; Marisa M Silveri
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Development of Landmark Use for Navigation in Children: Effects of Age, Sex, Working Memory and Landmark Type.

Authors:  Anne H van Hoogmoed; Joost Wegman; Danielle van den Brink; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Influence of Landmarks on Wayfinding and Brain Connectivity in Immersive Virtual Reality Environment.

Authors:  Greeshma Sharma; Yash Kaushal; Sushil Chandra; Vijander Singh; Alok P Mittal; Varun Dutt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-20

6.  The brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism affects encoding of object locations during active navigation.

Authors:  Joost Wegman; Anna Tyborowska; Martine Hoogman; Alejandro Arias Vásquez; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Differential prioritization of intramaze cue and boundary information during spatial navigation across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Franka Glöckner; Nicolas W Schuck; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Enhancing the Ecological Validity of fMRI Memory Research Using Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Nicco Reggente; Joey K-Y Essoe; Zahra M Aghajan; Amir V Tavakoli; Joseph F McGuire; Nanthia A Suthana; Jesse Rissman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Minocycline differentially modulates human spatial memory systems.

Authors:  Sam C Berens; Chris M Bird; Neil A Harrison
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 7.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.