Literature DB >> 24705824

The how and why of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists.

Arnold J H van Vliet1, Wichertje A Bron, Sara Mulder.   

Abstract

In the scientific community, the importance of communication to society is often underestimated. Scientists and scientific organisations often lack the skills to organise such communication effectively. The Dutch citizen science phenology network Nature's Calendar has been successful in communicating to the general public via numerous newspaper articles, television appearances, presentations, websites and social media. We refer to these publications as societal publications. Due to active communication to mass media, we frequently reach millions of people. This communication helped us to involve thousands of volunteers in recording the timing of phenological events like the start of flowering, leaf unfolding and bird migration, but also several health-related events like hay fever symptoms and tick bites. In this paper, we analyse and present our experiences with the Nature's Calendar project regarding societal publications. Based on this analysis, we explain the importance of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists in general, and we show how scientists can increase the news worthiness of scientific information and what factors and activities can increase the chances of media paying attention to this news. We show that societal publications help phenological networks by facilitating the recruitment, retention and instruction of observers. Furthermore, they stimulate the generation of new ideas and partners that lead to an increase in knowledge, awareness and behavioural change of the general public or specific stakeholders. They make projects, and scientists involved, better known to the public and increase their credibility and authority. Societal publications can catalyse the production of new publications, thereby enforcing the previous mentioned points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24705824     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0821-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  4 in total

1.  Bringing down the barriers.

Authors:  Jaap Willems
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Going public: good scientific conduct.

Authors:  Gitte Meyer; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.

Authors:  Hans Peter Peters; Dominique Brossard; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Sharon Dunwoody; Monika Kallfass; Steve Miller; Shoji Tsuchida
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere.

Authors:  Josep Peñuelas; Jordi Sardans; Marc Estiarte; Romà Ogaya; Jofre Carnicer; Marta Coll; Adria Barbeta; Albert Rivas-Ubach; Joan Llusià; Martin Garbulsky; Iolanda Filella; Alistair S Jump
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 10.863

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 2.  Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Joseph Roche; Laura Bell; Cecília Galvão; Yaela N Golumbic; Laure Kloetzer; Nieke Knoben; Mari Laakso; Julia Lorke; Greg Mannion; Luciano Massetti; Alice Mauchline; Kai Pata; Andy Ruck; Pavel Taraba; Silvia Winter
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  How media presence triggers participation in citizen science-The case of the mosquito monitoring project 'Mückenatlas'.

Authors:  Nadja Pernat; Jana Zscheischler; Helge Kampen; Emu-Felicitas Ostermann-Miyashita; Jonathan M Jeschke; Doreen Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.

Authors:  J Patrick Woolley; Michelle L McGowan; Harriet J A Teare; Victoria Coathup; Jennifer R Fishman; Richard A Settersten; Sigrid Sterckx; Jane Kaye; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns.

Authors:  Ria Follett; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.