Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.

Literature DB >> 18625578

Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.

Hans Peter Peters¹, Dominique Brossard, Suzanne de Cheveigné, Sharon Dunwoody, Monika Kallfass, Steve Miller, Shoji Tsuchida.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2008 PMID： 18625578 DOI： 10.1126/science.1157780

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN： 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

26 in total

Review 1. Popular culture representations of science: views from the Canadian stem cell research community.

Authors: Timothy Caulfield; Amy Zarzeczny
Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.739

2. Getting the word out.

Authors:
Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 24.884

3. Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.

Authors: Hans Peter Peters
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205

4. Familiarity and prudence of the Japanese public with research into induced pluripotent stem cells, and their desire for its proper regulation.

Authors: Ryuma Shineha; Masahiro Kawakami; Koji Kawakami; Motohiko Nagata; Takashi Tada; Kazuto Kato
Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.739

5. Science communication reconsidered.

Authors: Tania Bubela; Matthew C Nisbet; Rick Borchelt; Fern Brunger; Cristine Critchley; Edna Einsiedel; Gail Geller; Anil Gupta; Jürgen Hampel; Robyn Hyde-Lay; Eric W Jandciu; S Ashley Jones; Pam Kolopack; Summer Lane; Tim Lougheed; Brigitte Nerlich; Ubaka Ogbogu; Kathleen O'Riordan; Colin Ouellette; Mike Spear; Stephen Strauss; Thushaanthini Thavaratnam; Lisa Willemse; Timothy Caulfield
Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 54.908

Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.

Review 1. Popular culture representations of science: views from the Canadian stem cell research community.

2. Getting the word out.

3. Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.

4. Familiarity and prudence of the Japanese public with research into induced pluripotent stem cells, and their desire for its proper regulation.

5. Science communication reconsidered.

6. Opinion: Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication.

7. Facial appearance affects science communication.

8. An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators.

9. Science communication as political communication.

10. The how and why of societal publications for citizen science projects and scientists.