Literature DB >> 24704680

Accuracy of fluoroscopically-assisted pedicle screw placement: analysis of 1,218 screws in 198 patients.

Ender Koktekir1, Davut Ceylan2, Necati Tatarli3, Hakan Karabagli4, Fahri Recber4, Gokhan Akdemir4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1,218 pedicle screws for accuracy, with postoperative computed tomography (CT), in 198 patients who were operated on between March 2004 and September 2012.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of screw misplacement in patients who received a transpedicular screw fixation, with intraoperative fluoroscopy in the lateral and lateral with anteroposterior (AP) positions. The results are compared between the two groups. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study of accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic and lumbar spine. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consists of 198 consecutive patients who underwent transpedicular screw fixation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of screw placement was evaluated by postoperative CT scan. Misplacement was defined in cases where more than 25% of the screw size was residing outside the pedicle.
METHODS: The indications for hardware placement, radiologic studies, patient demographics, and reoperation rates were recorded. Five hundred twenty-eight screws (Group A, n=81) were inserted into the vertebral body with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy only, whereas 690 screws (Group B, n=117) were inserted with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy, and the final positions of the screws were checked with AP fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: A total of 1,218 screws were analyzed, with 962 screws placed at the lumbosacral region and 256 screws at the thoracic region. According to the postoperative CT scan, 27 screws (2.2%) were identified as breaching the pedicle. Nineteen of them (3.6%) were in Group A, whereas 8 (1.16%) were in Group B. The rate of pedicle breaches was significantly different between Group A and B (p=.0052). In Group A, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in 10 screws (1.9%), whereas medial violation was seen in 9 screws (1.7%). In Group B, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in six screws (0.87%), whereas medial violation was seen in two screws (0.29%). The medial and lateral penetration of screws were significantly different between Groups A and B (p<.05). A pedicle breach occurred in 21 patients, and 15 of them underwent a revision surgery to correct the misplaced screw. Of these patients, 11 (13.6%) were in Group A, and 4 (3.4%) were in Group B (p=.0335).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we evaluated and clarified the diagnostic value of intraoperative fluoroscopy in both the lateral and AP imaging that have not yet been evaluated in any comparative study. We concluded that the intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, especially in the AP position, significantly decreases the risk of screw misplacement and the results are comparable with other advanced techniques.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Fluoroscopy; Intraoperative imaging; Misplacement; Pedicle screw; Spinal stabilization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704680     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  7 in total

1.  Currently Adopted Criteria for Pedicle Screw Diameter Selection.

Authors:  Giovanni F Solitro; Keith Whitlock; Farid Amirouche; Ankit I Mehta; Annie McDonnell
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

2.  Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

3.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Comparing an Electronic Conductivity Device and a Multi-axis Angiography Unit with C-arm Fluoroscopy in Lumbar Fixation Surgery for Safety.

Authors:  Hiroto Kageyama; Shinichi Yoshimura; Kotaro Tatebayashi; Tomoko Iida; Kiyofumi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery.

Authors:  Lutfi Al-Khouja; Faris Shweikeh; Robert Pashman; J Patrick Johnson; Terrence T Kim; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 5.  Power-assisted pedicle screws placement: Is it as safe and as effective as manual technique? Narrative review of the literature and our technique.

Authors:  C Faldini; G Viroli; M Fiore; F Barile; M Manzetti; A Di Martino; A Ruffilli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-05-29

6.  Can Postoperative CT Imaging in Spine Surgery Be Replaced by Intraoperative 3D Rotation With the C-Arm?: Results of a Prospective Single Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Banat; Johannes Wach; Abdallah Salemdawod; Lisa Domurath; Jasmin Scorzin; Hartmut Vatter
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-07-14

7.  Electrochemotherapy of Spinal Metastases Using Transpedicular Approach-A Numerical Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Helena Cindrič; Bor Kos; Giuseppe Tedesco; Matteo Cadossi; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.