Literature DB >> 24704675

Spondylodiscitis by drug-multiresistant bacteria: a single-center experience of 25 cases.

Ehab Shiban1, Insa Janssen1, Maria Wostrack1, Sandro M Krieg1, Monika Horanin1, Michael Stoffel2, Bernhard Meyer1, Florian Ringel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although the incidence of pyogenic spinal infections is increasing, the ideal treatment of spondylodiscitis is still a controversially discussed issue. Furthermore, the proportion of multiresistant bacteria in spondylodiscitis is increasing, and treatment recommendations or reported results are missing for this especially difficult subset of patients.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcome and the postoperative antibacterial treatment regime. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients treated for a spondylodiscitis from multiresistant bacteria at our department between 2006 and 2011.
METHODS: Data were gathered through review of patients' case notes, relevant imaging, and electronic records. Magnetic resonance imaging of the whole spine including gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced T1 sequences and computed tomography scans of the affected regions were obtained in all cases. OUTCOME MEASURES: C-reactive protein (CRP) and complete blood cell count were analyzed in all cases using routine laboratory techniques. Neurologic deficits were classified according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified (15 gram-positive and 10 gram-negative drug-multiresistant bacteria). The mean age at presentation was 66 years, and 14 patients were male (56%). All patients presented with pain, and a neurologic deficit was present in 11 (44%) cases. An epidural abscess was found in 11 (44%) cases. At admission, CRP was elevated in all cases with a mean of 13±9.2 mg/dL. The main source of infection was previous spine surgery (36%). All patients in this series underwent surgical debridement of the infection and instrumentation of the spine. Postoperative intravenous antibiotics were administered for 19±8.6 days followed by 3±0.3 months of oral antibiotic therapy. Eradication of the infection was achieved ultimately in all surviving patients. Out of 11 patients with neurologic deficits, 4 had a full recovery, 4 improved incompletely, and 3 remained unchanged after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Staged surgical immobilization and instrumentation and optimal debridement at the interdiscal space and spinal canal is a reliable approach to achieve complete healing of spinal infection with multiresistant bacteria. A period of intravenous antibiotic therapy of 2 to 3 weeks followed by a 3-month oral antibiotic therapy seems appropriate for most cases.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discitis; Interbody fusion; Multiresistant bacteria; Spinal instrumentation; Spondylodiscitis; Surgical management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704675     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  8 in total

1.  Robot guidance for percutaneous minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws for pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with lower rates of wound breakdown compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation.

Authors:  Awad Alaid; Kajetan von Eckardstein; Nicolas Roydon Smoll; Volodymyr Solomiichuk; Veit Rohde; Ramon Martinez; Bawarjan Schatlo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  De novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vs. methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections of the spine, similar clinical outcome, despite more severe presentation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Basem Ishak; Amir Abdul-Jabbar; Gregory B Moss; Emre Yilmaz; Alexander von Glinski; Sven Frieler; Andreas W Unterberg; Ronan Blecher; Juan Altafulla; Jeffrey Roh; Robert A Hart; Rod J Oskouian; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Management of Pyogenic Spinal Infection, review of literature.

Authors:  Ahmed Aljawadi; Noman Jahangir; Ana Jeelani; Zak Ferguson; Noman Niazi; Frances Arnall; Anand Pillai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-12

4.  Comparison of gram-negative and gram-positive hematogenous pyogenic spondylodiscitis: clinical characteristics and outcomes of treatment.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Lee; Meng-Huang Wu; Chin-Chang Cheng; Tsung-Jen Huang; Tsung-Yu Huang; Chien-Yin Lee; Jou-Chen Huang; Yen-Yao Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Primary acquired spondylodiscitis shows a more severe course than spondylodiscitis following spine surgery: a single-center retrospective study of 159 cases.

Authors:  Anja Tschugg; Sara Lener; Sebastian Hartmann; Andreas Rietzler; Sabrina Neururer; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Total spine magnetic resonance imaging for detection of multifocal infection in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jeanette Henkelmann; Timm Denecke; Philipp Pieroh; Stephanie Einhorn; Nicolas H von der Hoeh; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Anna Voelker
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Early surgery with antibiotic medication was effective and efficient in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Min Wang; Guangfu Chen; Kuan-Hung Chen; Yong Wan; Bailing Chen; Xuenong Zou; Xinsheng Peng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Anaerobic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Ting Chen; Meng-Huang Wu; Tsung-Yu Huang; Yen-Yao Li; Tsung-Jen Huang; Chien-Yin Lee; Che-Han Lin; Ching-Yu Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.