Wei Guo1,2, Min Wang3, Guangfu Chen3, Kuan-Hung Chen1,2, Yong Wan1,2, Bailing Chen1,2, Xuenong Zou1,2, Xinsheng Peng4,5. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Spinal Surgery, Chancheng Central Hospital, Foshan, China. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. pengxs66@yahoo.com. 5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Guangzhou, China. pengxs66@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD) is challenging to the orthopedist with regards to diagnosis and treatment. The present study was designed to assess and suggest the most indicative diagnostic method and evaluate the effect of surgery comprising of debridement, instrumentation and fusion in treating PSD. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with PSD who underwent surgical intervention were retrospectively enrolled. Their medical documents, corrections of spinal alignment and improvements in neurological function were assessed. Surgical approaches were compared in lumbar surgeries regarding the improvements in lordotic angle and neurological function. RESULTS: Elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were found in 77.6 and 71.1% patients respectively. Infectious lesions were found at lumbar (85.5%), cervical (10.5%) and thoracic (3.9%), ascertained with contrast-enhanced MRI. For lumbar patients, surgery was performed through the anterior (26.2%), posterior (49.2%) or combined approach (24.6%), and differences in improvement of lordosis and neurological function between each approach were insignificant. The pathogen was identified in 22.4% of the patients. Postoperative antibiotic therapy was managed against the result of susceptibility test, or empirically given to patients with negative cultures. All antibiotic therapy was initiated intravenously for 4-6 weeks and orally for 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP and/or ESR, with focal hyper-intensity on contrast-enhanced MRI are suggestive of possible PSD. Surgical intervention comprising of debridement, short-segment instrumentation and fusion that early applied to the PSD patients followed by postoperative antibiotic therapy have demonstrated preferable outcomes, but require further study. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: This article advocates early surgery to enable prompt diagnosis and treatment of PSD, and thus guarantee favorable outcomes for patients, as is shown in our study. In addition, different surgical approaches to the lesions were compared and discussed in this manuscript, but no differences in outcome between approaches were found. This suggests that thorough debridement should be prioritized over selection of surgical approach. In summary, this article has large translational potential to be applied clinically.
BACKGROUND:Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD) is challenging to the orthopedist with regards to diagnosis and treatment. The present study was designed to assess and suggest the most indicative diagnostic method and evaluate the effect of surgery comprising of debridement, instrumentation and fusion in treating PSD. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with PSD who underwent surgical intervention were retrospectively enrolled. Their medical documents, corrections of spinal alignment and improvements in neurological function were assessed. Surgical approaches were compared in lumbar surgeries regarding the improvements in lordotic angle and neurological function. RESULTS: Elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were found in 77.6 and 71.1% patients respectively. Infectious lesions were found at lumbar (85.5%), cervical (10.5%) and thoracic (3.9%), ascertained with contrast-enhanced MRI. For lumbar patients, surgery was performed through the anterior (26.2%), posterior (49.2%) or combined approach (24.6%), and differences in improvement of lordosis and neurological function between each approach were insignificant. The pathogen was identified in 22.4% of the patients. Postoperative antibiotic therapy was managed against the result of susceptibility test, or empirically given to patients with negative cultures. All antibiotic therapy was initiated intravenously for 4-6 weeks and orally for 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP and/or ESR, with focal hyper-intensity on contrast-enhanced MRI are suggestive of possible PSD. Surgical intervention comprising of debridement, short-segment instrumentation and fusion that early applied to the PSDpatients followed by postoperative antibiotic therapy have demonstrated preferable outcomes, but require further study. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: This article advocates early surgery to enable prompt diagnosis and treatment of PSD, and thus guarantee favorable outcomes for patients, as is shown in our study. In addition, different surgical approaches to the lesions were compared and discussed in this manuscript, but no differences in outcome between approaches were found. This suggests that thorough debridement should be prioritized over selection of surgical approach. In summary, this article has large translational potential to be applied clinically.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antibiotic; Laboratory test; Pyogenic spondylodiscitis; Radiology; Surgery
Authors: Joseph S Butler; Martin J Shelly; Marcus Timlin; William G Powderly; John M O'Byrne Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Baharak Babouee Flury; Luigia Elzi; Marko Kolbe; Reno Frei; Maja Weisser; Stefan Schären; Andreas F Widmer; Manuel Battegay Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Johan Courjon; Adrien Lemaignen; Idir Ghout; Audrey Therby; Nadia Belmatoug; Aurélien Dinh; Guillaume Gras; Louis Bernard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240