Literature DB >> 24704639

Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits.

Damiano Urbinello1, Wout Joseph2, Anke Huss3, Leen Verloock2, Johan Beekhuizen3, Roel Vermeulen3, Luc Martens2, Martin Röösli4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns of the general public about potential adverse health effects caused by radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) led authorities to introduce precautionary exposure limits, which vary considerably between regions. It may be speculated that precautionary limits affect the base station network in a manner that mean population exposure unintentionally increases. AIMS: The objectives of this multicentre study were to compare mean exposure levels in outdoor areas across four different European cities and to compare with regulatory RF-EMF exposure levels in the corresponding areas.
METHODS: We performed measurements in the cities of Amsterdam (the Netherlands, regulatory limits for mobile phone base station frequency bands: 41-61 V/m), Basel (Switzerland, 4-6 V/m), Ghent (Belgium, 3-4.5 V/m) and Brussels (Belgium, 2.9-4.3 V/m) using a portable measurement device. Measurements were conducted in three different types of outdoor areas (central and non-central residential areas and downtown), between 2011 and 2012 at 12 different days. On each day, measurements were taken every 4s for approximately 15 to 30 min per area. Measurements per urban environment were repeated 12 times during 1 year.
RESULTS: Arithmetic mean values for mobile phone base station exposure ranged between 0.22 V/m (Basel) and 0.41 V/m (Amsterdam) in all outdoor areas combined. The 95th percentile for total RF-EMF exposure varied between 0.46 V/m (Basel) and 0.82 V/m (Amsterdam) and the 99th percentile between 0.81 V/m (Basel) and 1.20 V/m (Brussels).
CONCLUSIONS: All exposure levels were far below international reference levels proposed by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). Our study did not find indications that lowering the regulatory limit results in higher mobile phone base station exposure levels.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure assessment; Portable exposure meter; Radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs); Regulatory limits

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704639     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  7 in total

1.  Radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures in kindergarten children.

Authors:  Chhavi Raj Bhatt; Mary Redmayne; Baki Billah; Michael J Abramson; Geza Benke
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Mapping of radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in outdoor environment and comparing with reference levels for general public health.

Authors:  Mustafa Cansiz; Teymuraz Abbasov; M Bahattin Kurt; A Recai Celik
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 3.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sanjay Sagar; Stefan Dongus; Anna Schoeni; Katharina Roser; Marloes Eeftens; Benjamin Struchen; Milena Foerster; Noëmi Meier; Seid Adem; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Comparison of statistic methods for censored personal exposure to RF-EMF data.

Authors:  Alberto Najera; Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Enrique Arribas; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Personal Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields among Australian Adults.

Authors:  Berihun M Zeleke; Christopher Brzozek; Chhavi Raj Bhatt; Michael J Abramson; Rodney J Croft; Frederik Freudenstein; Peter Wiedemann; Geza Benke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Antibacterial Susceptibility Pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus after Exposure to Electromagnetic Waves Emitted from Mobile Phone Simulator.

Authors:  M M Movahedi; F Nouri; A Tavakoli Golpaygani; L Ataee; S Amani; M Taheri
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-12-01

7.  Protocol for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies in 5th generation telecommunication networks.

Authors:  Maarten Velghe; Sam Aerts; Luc Martens; Wout Joseph; Arno Thielens
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.