Literature DB >> 24704232

Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.

C Hozé1, S Fritz2, F Phocas3, D Boichard3, V Ducrocq3, P Croiseau3.   

Abstract

Single-breed genomic selection (GS) based on medium single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density (~50,000; 50K) is now routinely implemented in several large cattle breeds. However, building large enough reference populations remains a challenge for many medium or small breeds. The high-density BovineHD BeadChip (HD chip; Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) containing 777,609 SNP developed in 2010 is characterized by short-distance linkage disequilibrium expected to be maintained across breeds. Therefore, combining reference populations can be envisioned. A population of 1,869 influential ancestors from 3 dairy breeds (Holstein, Montbéliarde, and Normande) was genotyped with the HD chip. Using this sample, 50K genotypes were imputed within breed to high-density genotypes, leading to a large HD reference population. This population was used to develop a multi-breed genomic evaluation. The goal of this paper was to investigate the gain of multi-breed genomic evaluation for a small breed. The advantage of using a large breed (Normande in the present study) to mimic a small breed is the large potential validation population to compare alternative genomic selection approaches more reliably. In the Normande breed, 3 training sets were defined with 1,597, 404, and 198 bulls, and a unique validation set included the 394 youngest bulls. For each training set, estimated breeding values (EBV) were computed using pedigree-based BLUP, single-breed BayesC, or multi-breed BayesC for which the reference population was formed by any of the Normande training data sets and 4,989 Holstein and 1,788 Montbéliarde bulls. Phenotypes were standardized by within-breed genetic standard deviation, the proportion of polygenic variance was set to 30%, and the estimated number of SNP with a nonzero effect was about 7,000. The 2 genomic selection (GS) approaches were performed using either the 50K or HD genotypes. The correlations between EBV and observed daughter yield deviations (DYD) were computed for 6 traits and using the different prediction approaches. Compared with pedigree-based BLUP, the average gain in accuracy with GS in small populations was 0.057 for the single-breed and 0.086 for multi-breed approach. This gain was up to 0.193 and 0.209, respectively, with the large reference population. Improvement of EBV prediction due to the multi-breed evaluation was higher for animals not closely related to the reference population. In the case of a breed with a small reference population size, the increase in correlation due to multi-breed GS was 0.141 for bulls without their sire in reference population compared with 0.016 for bulls with their sire in reference population. These results demonstrate that multi-breed GS can contribute to increase genomic evaluation accuracy in small breeds.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cattle; high-density chip; multi-breed genomic selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704232     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  16 in total

1.  Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.

Authors:  Yvette Steyn; Daniela A L Lourenco; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Mario P L Calus; Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Irene van den Berg; Didier Boichard; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.

Authors:  Luiz F Brito; Shannon M Clarke; John C McEwan; Stephen P Miller; Natalie K Pickering; Wendy E Bain; Ken G Dodds; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Zezhao Wang; Bo Zhu; Ying Liu; Hongwei Li; Farhad Bordbar; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Shengli Zhang; Lingyang Xu; Junya Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Challenges and opportunities in genetic improvement of local livestock breeds.

Authors:  Filippo Biscarini; Ezequiel L Nicolazzi; Alessandra Stella; Paul J Boettcher; Gustavo Gandini
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; William Barendse; John M Henshall; Sean M McWilliam; Sigrid A Lehnert; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Using Sequence Variants in Linkage Disequilibrium with Causative Mutations to Improve Across-Breed Prediction in Dairy Cattle: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Irene van den Berg; Didier Boichard; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A hybrid expectation maximisation and MCMC sampling algorithm to implement Bayesian mixture model based genomic prediction and QTL mapping.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen; Phil J Bowman; Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.