Literature DB >> 24703952

Dephosphorylation enables the recruitment of 53BP1 to double-strand DNA breaks.

Dong-Hyun Lee1, Sanket S Acharya2, Mijung Kwon3, Pascal Drane2, Yinghua Guan4, Guillaume Adelmant5, Peter Kalev2, Jagesh Shah4, David Pellman3, Jarrod A Marto5, Dipanjan Chowdhury6.   

Abstract

Excluding 53BP1 from chromatin is required to attenuate the DNA damage response during mitosis, yet the functional relevance and regulation of this exclusion are unclear. Here we show that 53BP1 is phosphorylated during mitosis on two residues, T1609 and S1618, located in its well-conserved ubiquitination-dependent recruitment (UDR) motif. Phosphorylating these sites blocks the interaction of the UDR motif with mononuclesomes containing ubiquitinated histone H2A and impedes binding of 53BP1 to mitotic chromatin. Ectopic recruitment of 53BP1-T1609A/S1618A to mitotic DNA lesions was associated with significant mitotic defects that could be reversed by inhibiting nonhomologous end-joining. We also reveal that protein phosphatase complex PP4C/R3β dephosphorylates T1609 and S1618 to allow the recruitment of 53BP1 to chromatin in G1 phase. Our results identify key sites of 53BP1 phosphorylation during mitosis, identify the counteracting phosphatase complex that restores the potential for DDR during interphase, and establish the physiological importance of this regulation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703952      PMCID: PMC4030556          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  48 in total

Review 1.  Serine/threonine phosphatases in the DNA damage response and cancer.

Authors:  A Peng; J L Maller
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  ATM-dependent and -independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage.

Authors:  Ariel Bensimon; Alexander Schmidt; Yael Ziv; Ran Elkon; Shih-Ya Wang; David J Chen; Ruedi Aebersold; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 3.  The DNA damage response during mitosis.

Authors:  Anne Margriet Heijink; Małgorzata Krajewska; Marcel A T M van Vugt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Samuel F Bunting; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Hua-Tang Chen; Federica Polato; Amanda Gunn; Anne Bothmer; Niklas Feldhahn; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Liu Cao; Xiaoling Xu; Chu-Xia Deng; Toren Finkel; Michel Nussenzweig; Jeremy M Stark; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Martin V Bennetzen; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Jakob Bunkenborg; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Jens S Andersen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Marcel A T M van Vugt; Alexandra K Gardino; Rune Linding; Gerard J Ostheimer; H Christian Reinhardt; Shao-En Ong; Chris S Tan; Hua Miao; Susan M Keezer; Jeijin Li; Tony Pawson; Timothy A Lewis; Steven A Carr; Stephen J Smerdon; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity is required during mitosis for timely satisfaction of the mitotic checkpoint but not for the fidelity of chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Kyunghee Lee; Alison E Kenny; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Peter Bouwman; Amal Aly; Jose M Escandell; Mark Pieterse; Jirina Bartkova; Hanneke van der Gulden; Sanne Hiddingh; Maria Thanasoula; Atul Kulkarni; Qifeng Yang; Bruce G Haffty; Johanna Tommiska; Carl Blomqvist; Ronny Drapkin; David J Adams; Heli Nevanlinna; Jiri Bartek; Madalena Tarsounas; Shridar Ganesan; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Analysis of DNA double-strand break response and chromatin structure in mitosis using laser microirradiation.

Authors:  Veronica Gomez-Godinez; Tao Wu; Adria J Sherman; Christopher S Lee; Lih-Huei Liaw; You Zhongsheng; Kyoko Yokomori; Michael W Berns
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  55 in total

1.  TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis.

Authors:  Irene Gallina; Signe Korbo Christiansen; Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen; Michael Lisby; Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Nico P Dantuma; Haico van Attikum
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Not All DDRs Are Created Equal: Non-Canonical DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  Protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit is overexpressed in glioma and promotes glioma cell proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Mengyou Li; Xin Li; Shiming Xu; Pengfei Xue; QingZhe Li; Qingyang Lu; Qingbin Jia; Lianqun Zhang; Xueyuan Li; Xingang Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-09

6.  The CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib Exhibits Monotherapy Activity in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Models and Sensitizes to PARP Inhibition.

Authors:  Kalindi Parmar; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Zhigang C Wang; Sangeetha Palakurthi; Paul T Kirschmeier; Chunyu Yang; Larissa A Sambel; Anniina Färkkilä; Elizaveta Reznichenko; Hunter D Reavis; Connor E Dunn; Lee Zou; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce F Liu; Alan D D'Andrea; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  TIRR regulates 53BP1 by masking its histone methyl-lysine binding function.

Authors:  Pascal Drané; Marie-Eve Brault; Gaofeng Cui; Khyati Meghani; Shweta Chaubey; Alexandre Detappe; Nishita Parnandi; Yizhou He; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Maria Victoria Botuyan; Alkmini Kalousi; William T Yewdell; Christian Münch; J Wade Harper; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Evi Soutoglou; Georges Mer; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Mechanisms of Ubiquitin-Nucleosome Recognition and Regulation of 53BP1 Chromatin Recruitment by RNF168/169 and RAD18.

Authors:  Qi Hu; Maria Victoria Botuyan; Gaofeng Cui; Debiao Zhao; Georges Mer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  DNA damage response during mouse oocyte maturation.

Authors:  Alexandra Mayer; Vladimir Baran; Yogo Sakakibara; Adela Brzakova; Ivana Ferencova; Jan Motlik; Tomoya S Kitajima; Richard M Schultz; Petr Solc
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.