Kanan Patel1, Gregg C Fonarow2, O James Ekundayo3, Inmaculada B Aban4, Meredith L Kilgore4, Thomas E Love5, Dalane W Kitzman6, Mihai Gheorghiade7, Richard M Allman8, Ali Ahmed9. 1. University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. 2. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 3. Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States. 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. 5. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States. 6. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States. 7. Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States. 8. Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatrics and Extended Care Services, Washington, DC, United States. 9. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: aahmed@uab.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers considered evidenced-based to heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their recommended target doses in older adults with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: In OPTIMIZE-HF (2003-2004) linked to Medicare (2003-2008), of the 10,570 older (age ≥ 65 years, mean, 81 years) adults with HFpEF (EF ≥ 40%, mean 55%), 8373 had no contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. After excluding 4614 patients receiving pre-admission beta-blockers, the remaining 3759 patients were potentially eligible for new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers and 1454 received them. We assembled a propensity-matched cohort of 1099 pairs of patients receiving beta-blockers and no beta-blockers, balanced on 115 baseline characteristics. Evidence-based beta-blockers for HFrEF, namely, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol and their respective guideline-recommended target doses were 50, 200, and 10mg/day. RESULTS: During 6 years of follow-up, new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers had no association with the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.94-1.13; p=0.569). This association did not vary by beta-blocker evidence class or daily dose. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.90-1.10; p=0.897) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.34; p=0.014), respectively. The latter association lost significance when higher EF cutoffs of ≥45%, ≥50% and ≥55% were used. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of therapy with beta-blockers considered evidence-based for HFrEF and in target doses recommended for HFrEF had no association with the composite or individual endpoints of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization in HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: We examined the clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers considered evidenced-based to heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their recommended target doses in older adults with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: In OPTIMIZE-HF (2003-2004) linked to Medicare (2003-2008), of the 10,570 older (age ≥ 65 years, mean, 81 years) adults with HFpEF (EF ≥ 40%, mean 55%), 8373 had no contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. After excluding 4614 patients receiving pre-admission beta-blockers, the remaining 3759 patients were potentially eligible for new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers and 1454 received them. We assembled a propensity-matched cohort of 1099 pairs of patients receiving beta-blockers and no beta-blockers, balanced on 115 baseline characteristics. Evidence-based beta-blockers for HFrEF, namely, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol and their respective guideline-recommended target doses were 50, 200, and 10mg/day. RESULTS: During 6 years of follow-up, new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers had no association with the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.94-1.13; p=0.569). This association did not vary by beta-blocker evidence class or daily dose. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.90-1.10; p=0.897) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.34; p=0.014), respectively. The latter association lost significance when higher EF cutoffs of ≥45%, ≥50% and ≥55% were used. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of therapy with beta-blockers considered evidence-based for HFrEF and in target doses recommended for HFrEF had no association with the composite or individual endpoints of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization in HFpEF.
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Wendy Gattis Stough; Mihai Gheorghiade; Barry H Greenberg; Christopher M O'Connor; Karen Pieper; Jie Lena Sun; Clyde Yancy; James B Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Wendy Gattis Stough; Mihai Gheorghiade; Barry H Greenberg; Christopher M O'Connor; Jie Lena Sun; Clyde Yancy; James B Young Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: John G F Cleland; Michal Tendera; Jerzy Adamus; Nick Freemantle; Lech Polonski; Jacqueline Taylor Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-09-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Gilbert J Perry; Jerome L Fleg; Thomas E Love; David C Goff; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Adrian F Hernandez; Bradley G Hammill; Christopher M O'Connor; Kevin A Schulman; Lesley H Curtis; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Wendy Gattis Stough; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Mihai Gheorghiade; Barry H Greenberg; Christopher M O'Connor; Jie Lena Sun; Clyde W Yancy; James B Young Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Faiez Zannad; Thomas E Love; Jose Tallaj; Mihai Gheorghiade; Olaniyi James Ekundayo; Bertram Pitt Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Barry M Massie; Peter E Carson; John J McMurray; Michel Komajda; Robert McKelvie; Michael R Zile; Susan Anderson; Mark Donovan; Erik Iverson; Christoph Staiger; Agata Ptaszynska Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patricia Palau; Julia Seller; Eloy Domínguez; Inés Gómez; José María Ramón; Clara Sastre; Rafael de la Espriella; Enrique Santas; Gema Miñana; Francisco J Chorro; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Julio Núñez Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Phillip H Lam; Daniel J Dooley; Prakash Deedwania; Steven N Singh; Deepak L Bhatt; Charity J Morgan; Javed Butler; Selma F Mohammed; Wen-Chih Wu; Gurusher Panjrath; Michael R Zile; Michel White; Cherinne Arundel; Thomas E Love; Marc R Blackman; Richard M Allman; Wilbert S Aronow; Stefan D Anker; Gregg C Fonarow; Ali Ahmed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sara Maldonado-Martín; Peter H Brubaker; Cemal Ozemek; Jon A Jayo-Montoya; J Thomas Becton; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.646