OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved and reduced systolic function heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved systolic function (PSF) is common but not well understood. METHODS: This analysis of the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure) registry compared 20,118 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and 21,149 patients with PSF (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] > or =40%). Sixty- to 90-day follow-up was obtained in a pre-specified 10% sample of patients. Analyses of patients with PSF defined as EF >50% were also performed for comparison. RESULTS: Patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) were more likely to be older, female, and Caucasian and to have a nonischemic etiology. Although length of hospital stay was the same in both groups, risk of in-hospital mortality was lower in patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) (2.9% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.0001). During 60- to 90-day post-discharge follow-up, patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) had a similar mortality risk (9.5% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.459) and rehospitalization rates (29.2% vs. 29.9%; p = 0.591) compared with patients with LVSD. Findings were comparable with those with PSF defined as EF >50%. In a risk- and propensity-adjusted model, there were no significant relationships between discharge use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or beta-blocker and 60- to 90-day mortality and rehospitalization rates in patients with PSF. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry reveal a high prevalence of HF with PSF, and these patients have a similar post-discharge mortality risk and equally high rates of rehospitalization as patients with HF and LVSD. Despite the burden to patients and health care systems, data are lacking on effective management strategies for patients with HF and PSF. (Organized Program To Initiate Lifesaving Treatment In Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure [OPTIMIZE-HF]); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00344513?order=1; NCT00344513).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved and reduced systolic function heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND:Heart failure with preserved systolic function (PSF) is common but not well understood. METHODS: This analysis of the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure) registry compared 20,118 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and 21,149 patients with PSF (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] > or =40%). Sixty- to 90-day follow-up was obtained in a pre-specified 10% sample of patients. Analyses of patients with PSF defined as EF >50% were also performed for comparison. RESULTS:Patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) were more likely to be older, female, and Caucasian and to have a nonischemic etiology. Although length of hospital stay was the same in both groups, risk of in-hospital mortality was lower in patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) (2.9% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.0001). During 60- to 90-day post-discharge follow-up, patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) had a similar mortality risk (9.5% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.459) and rehospitalization rates (29.2% vs. 29.9%; p = 0.591) compared with patients with LVSD. Findings were comparable with those with PSF defined as EF >50%. In a risk- and propensity-adjusted model, there were no significant relationships between discharge use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or beta-blocker and 60- to 90-day mortality and rehospitalization rates in patients with PSF. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry reveal a high prevalence of HF with PSF, and these patients have a similar post-discharge mortality risk and equally high rates of rehospitalization as patients with HF and LVSD. Despite the burden to patients and health care systems, data are lacking on effective management strategies for patients with HF and PSF. (Organized Program To Initiate Lifesaving Treatment In Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure [OPTIMIZE-HF]); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00344513?order=1; NCT00344513).
Authors: Mihai Gheorghiade; Peter S Pang; Andrew P Ambrosy; Gloria Lan; Philip Schmidt; Gerasimos Filippatos; Marvin Konstam; Karl Swedberg; Thomas Cook; Brian Traver; Aldo Maggioni; John Burnett; Liliana Grinfeld; James Udelson; Faiez Zannad Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Sameer Ather; Wenyaw Chan; Biykem Bozkurt; David Aguilar; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Amit A Zachariah; Xander H T Wehrens; Anita Deswal Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Senthil Selvaraj; Irwin Klein; Sara Danzi; Nausheen Akhter; Robert O Bonow; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Robert J Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jane S Saczynski; Grace Hsu; David D McManus; David J Magid; David H Smith; Alan S Go Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mihai Gheorghiade; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Stephen J Greene; Robert J Mentz; Kirkwood F Adams; Stefan D Anker; Malcolm Arnold; Fabio Baschiera; John G F Cleland; Gadi Cotter; Gregg C Fonarow; Christopher Giordano; Marco Metra; Frank Misselwitz; Eva Mühlhofer; Savina Nodari; W Frank Peacock; Burkert M Pieske; Hani N Sabbah; Naoki Sato; Monica R Shah; Norman L Stockbridge; John R Teerlink; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Andrew Zalewski; Faiez Zannad; Javed Butler Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.214