Literature DB >> 24702725

Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles.

Ahmed Bilal Ashraf1, Dania Daye, Sara Gavenonis, Carolyn Mies, Michael Feldman, Mark Rosen, Despina Kontos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a method for identifying intrinsic imaging phenotypes in breast cancer tumors and to investigate their association with prognostic gene expression profiles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) images of the breast in 56 women (mean age, 55.6 years; age range, 37-74 years) diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2005 and 2010. The study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Primary tumors were assayed with a validated gene expression assay that provides a score for the likelihood of recurrence. A multiparametric imaging phenotype vector was extracted for each tumor by using quantitative morphologic, kinetic, and spatial heterogeneity features. Multivariate linear regression was performed to test associations between DCE MR imaging features and recurrence likelihood. To identify intrinsic imaging phenotypes, hierarchical clustering was performed on the extracted feature vectors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to classify tumors at high versus low or medium risk of recurrence. To determine the additional value of intrinsic phenotypes, the phenotype category was tested as an additional variable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were used to assess classification performance.
RESULTS: There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.71, R(2) = 0.50, P < .001) between DCE MR imaging features and the recurrence score. DCE MR imaging features were predictive of recurrence risk as determined by the surrogate assay, with an Az of 0.77 (P < .01). Four dominant imaging phenotypes were detected, with two including only low- and medium-risk tumors. When the phenotype category was used as an additional variable, the Az increased to 0.82 (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Intrinsic imaging phenotypes exist for breast cancer tumors and correlate with recurrence likelihood as determined with gene expression profiling. These imaging biomarkers could ultimately help guide treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24702725      PMCID: PMC4564060          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  45 in total

1.  Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Narisada; Takatoshi Aoki; Takakazu Sasaguri; Hiroshi Hashimoto; Tetsumi Konishi; Masaru Morita; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of disease.

Authors:  Sara C Gavenonis; Susan Orel Roth
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions--a pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Gary M K Tse; Benjaporn Chaiwun; Ka-Tak Wong; David K Yeung; Amy L M Pang; Alice P Y Tang; Humairah S Cheung
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors.

Authors:  Ruey-Feng Chang; Wen-Jie Wu; Woo Kyung Moon; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

7.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules.

Authors:  Maximilian Diehn; Christine Nardini; David S Wang; Susan McGovern; Mahesh Jayaraman; Yu Liang; Kenneth Aldape; Soonmee Cha; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization.

Authors:  Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Microarray-based class discovery for molecular classification of breast cancer: analysis of interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Alan Mackay; Britta Weigelt; Anita Grigoriadis; Bas Kreike; Rachael Natrajan; Roger A'Hern; David S P Tan; Mitch Dowsett; Alan Ashworth; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  60 in total

1.  Heterogeneous Enhancement Patterns of Tumor-adjacent Parenchyma at MR Imaging Are Associated with Dysregulated Signaling Pathways and Poor Survival in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Bailiang Li; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Daniel L Rubin; Sandy Napel; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast cancer molecular subtype classifier that incorporates MRI features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Jung Hun Oh; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Elizabeth A Morris; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Association of distant recurrence-free survival with algorithmically extracted MRI characteristics in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Ashirbani Saha; Michael R Harowicz; Elizabeth Hope Cain; Jeffrey R Marks; P Kelly Marcom
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI characteristics associated with prognostic pathological factors and recurrence risk in invasive ER+/HER2- breast cancers.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Vicky T Nguyen; Habib Rahbar; Daniel S Hippe; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Mara H Rendi; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A study of association of Oncotype DX recurrence score with DCE-MRI characteristics using multivariate machine learning models.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Michael R Harowicz; Weiyao Wang; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  How Can Advanced Imaging Be Used to Mitigate Potential Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis?

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Elizabeth S McDonald; Janie M Lee; Savannah C Partridge; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Breast cancer subtype intertumor heterogeneity: MRI-based features predict results of a genomic assay.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward.

Authors:  D Leithner; G J Wengert; T H Helbich; S Thakur; R E Ochoa-Albiztegui; E A Morris; K Pinker
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype with MRI Dataset Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Nishant Gupta; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; John Nemer; Mary Sun; Peter Chang; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Margarita Zuley; Marie Ganott; Jose M Net; Elizabeth J Sutton; Kathleen R Brandt; Gary J Whitman; Suzanne D Conzen; Li Lan; Yuan Ji; Yitan Zhu; Carl C Jaffe; Erich P Huang; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Elizabeth A Morris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.