Literature DB >> 24701980

Pathological prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: analysis of 113 cases.

Aurélie Sannier1, Jérémie H Lefèvre, Yves Panis, Dominique Cazals-Hatem, Pierre Bedossa, Nathalie Guedj.   

Abstract

AIMS: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by surgical resection is the treatment for locally advanced mid-rectal or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative histological prognostic factors in a series of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant RCT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were performed according to CAP recommendations, with additional criteria such as tumour budding, the presence of calcifications, and response to neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to Modified Rectal Cancer Regression Grade (m-RCRG). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 67.6%. In univariate analysis, ypTN stage, tumour budding, circumferential margin, invaded margin and vascular and perineural invasion were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, the presence of calcifications (P = 0.04) and an involved circumferential margin (P = 0.03) were the only independent factors for worse DFS. mRCRG was not correlated with DFS. Among the 50 m-RCRG1 tumours, DFS was better in ypT0 patients than in other ypT stages (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of calcifications in the tumour bed is described for the first time as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The prognostic value of budding was demonstrated in this study after neoadjuvant RCT. ypT stage appears to be a more reliable predictor of oncological outcome than histological tumour regression grade, which needs to be standardized for better reproducibility.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  budding; calcifications; neoadjuvant therapy; rectal cancer; regression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24701980     DOI: 10.1111/his.12432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  10 in total

1.  Validation of a Proposed Tumor Regression Grading Scheme for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy as a Prognostic Indicator for Survival.

Authors:  Sun Mi Lee; Matthew H G Katz; Li Liu; Manonmani Sundar; Hua Wang; Gauri R Varadhachary; Robert A Wolff; Jeffrey E Lee; Anirban Maitra; Jason B Fleming; Asif Rashid; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Karen Becker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Tumor volume reduction rate is superior to RECIST for predicting the pathological response of rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Results from a prospective study.

Authors:  Jian Xiao; Yuting Tan; Wenyun Li; Jiaying Gong; Zhiyang Zhou; Yan Huang; Jian Zheng; Yanhong Deng; Lei Wang; Junsheng Peng; Donglin Ren; Ping Lan; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.

Authors:  Alessandro Lugli; Richard Kirsch; Yoichi Ajioka; Fred Bosman; Gieri Cathomas; Heather Dawson; Hala El Zimaity; Jean-François Fléjou; Tine Plato Hansen; Arndt Hartmann; Sanjay Kakar; Cord Langner; Iris Nagtegaal; Giacomo Puppa; Robert Riddell; Ari Ristimäki; Kieran Sheahan; Thomas Smyrk; Kenichi Sugihara; Benoît Terris; Hideki Ueno; Michael Vieth; Inti Zlobec; Phil Quirke
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Perineural Invasion Predicts for Distant Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery.

Authors:  Priyanka Chablani; Phuong Nguyen; Xueliang Pan; Andrew Robinson; Steve Walston; Christina Wu; Wendy L Frankel; Wei Chen; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Arnab Chakravarti; Evan Wuthrick; Terence M Williams
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  A novel histologic grading scheme based on poorly differentiated clusters is applicable to treated rectal cancer and is associated with established histopathological prognosticators.

Authors:  Michelle Yang; Aseeb Ur Rehman; Chunlai Zuo; Christine E Sheehan; Edward C Lee; Jingmei Lin; Zijin Zhao; Euna Choi; Hwajeong Lee
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of tumour budding in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A C Rogers; D C Winter; A Heeney; D Gibbons; A Lugli; G Puppa; K Sheahan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The potential predictive value of tumor budding for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tarkan Jäger; Daniel Neureiter; Mohammad Fallaha; Philipp Schredl; Tobias Kiesslich; Romana Urbas; Eckhard Klieser; Josef Holzinger; Felix Sedlmayer; Klaus Emmanuel; Adam Dinnewitzer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  What are the most important prognostic factors in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Sol-Min Kim; Ghilsuk Yoon; An Na Seo
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2019-04-01

10.  Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Iryna Trotsyuk; Halina Sparschuh; Alice Josephine Müller; Konrad Neumann; Martin Kruschewski; David Horst; Sefer Elezkurtaj
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.