Literature DB >> 24701459

The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography.

Ju-Han Kang1, Kook-Sun Lee1, Min-Gyu Oh1, Hwa-Young Choi1, Sae-Rom Lee1, Song-Hee Oh1, Yoon-Joo Choi1, Gyu-Tae Kim1, Yong-Suk Choi1, Eui-Hwan Hwang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in a Korean population by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of 1933 patients (884 male and 1049 female) were evaluated using PSR-9000N and Alphard-Vega 3030 Dental CT units (Asahi Roentgen Ind. Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). Image analysis was performed by using OnDemand3D software (CyberMed Inc., Seoul, Korea). The bifid mandibular canal was identified and classified into four types, namely, the forward canal, buccolingual canal, dental canal, and retromolar canal. Statistical analysis was performed by using the chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: Bifid mandibular canals were observed in 198 (10.2%) of 1933 patients. The most frequently observed type of bifid mandibular canal was the retromolar canal (n=104, rate: 52.5%) without any significant difference among the incidence of each age and gender. The mean diameter of the accessory canal was 1.27 mm (range: 0.27-3.29 mm) without any significant difference among the mean diameter of each type of the bifid mandibular canal. The mean length of the bifid mandibular canals was 14.97mm(range: 2.17-38.8 mm) with only a significant difference between the dental canal and the other types.
CONCLUSION: The bifid mandibular canal is not uncommon in Koreans and has a prevalence of 10.2% as indicated in the present study. It is suggested that a CBCT examination be recommended for detecting a bifid canal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abnormalities; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Mandibular Nerve; Radiography

Year:  2014        PMID: 24701459      PMCID: PMC3972406          DOI: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  21 in total

1.  Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  A Kuribayashi; H Watanabe; A Imaizumi; W Tantanapornkul; K Katakami; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography.

Authors:  B Klinge; A Petersson; P Maly
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Failure to obtain adequate anaesthesia associated with a bifid mandibular canal: a case report.

Authors:  K Lew; G Townsen
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.291

4.  Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal.

Authors:  Burak Bilecenoglu; Nihat Tuncer
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 5.  Failure of locoregional anesthesia in dental practice. Review of the literature.

Authors:  Araceli Boronat López; Miguel Peñarrocha Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2006-11-01

6.  Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.

Authors:  Munetaka Naitoh; Kino Nakahara; Yutaka Suenaga; Kenichi Gotoh; Shintaro Kondo; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-01

7.  [The types of the mandibular canal].

Authors:  J Zografos; M Kolokoudias; E Papadakis
Journal:  Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir       Date:  1990-03

8.  Bifid mandibular canal.

Authors:  J M Sanchis; Miguel Peñarrocha; F Soler
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  The radiographic appearance of the inferior dental canal: an additional variation.

Authors:  C J Nortjé; A G Farman; J J de V Joubert
Journal:  Br J Oral Surg       Date:  1977-11

10.  The inferior alveolar and mylohyoid nerves: an anatomic study and relationship to local anesthesia of the anterior mandibular teeth.

Authors:  S Wilson; P Johns; P M Fuller
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia F Haas; Kamile Dutra; André Luís Porporatti; Luis A Mezzomo; Graziela De Luca Canto; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Corrêa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Classifications of mandibular canal branching: A review of literature.

Authors:  Mauricio Augusto Aquino Castro; Manuel Oscar Lagravere-Vich; Tânia Mara Pimenta Amaral; Mauro Henrique Guimaraes Abreu; Ricardo Alves Mesquita
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

3.  [Analysis of bifid mandibular canal via cone beam computed tomography].

Authors:  Guo Yi; Zhang Qiaohong; Han Xiaoqian
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review.

Authors:  J J Valenzuela-Fuenzalida; C Cariseo; M Gold; D Díaz; M Orellana; Joe Iwanaga
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography.

Authors:  J Muinelo-Lorenzo; J A Suárez-Quintanilla; A Fernández-Alonso; S Marsillas-Rascado; M M Suárez-Cunqueiro
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Ex vivo comparison of CBCT and digital periapical radiographs for the quantitative assessment of periodontal defects.

Authors:  Maurice Ruetters; D Hagenfeld; N ElSayed; N Zimmermann; H Gehrig; T-S Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Smartphone use and schema-based learning in dentomaxillofacial radiology practice: a case report from one College of Dentistry.

Authors:  Young-A Ji; You-Mee Lee; Hyun-Dae Lim; Won-Jong Park; Ji-Hye Jung; Je-Woo Lee; Byung-Do Lee
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Mandibular canal branching assessed with cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mauricio Augusto Aquino de Castro; Sâmila Gonçalves Barra; Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich; Mauro Henrique Guimaraes Abreu; Ricardo Alves Mesquita
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  First Report of Tripled Retromolar Foramina.

Authors:  Puhan He; Joe Iwanaga; Mindy K Truong; Nimer Adeeb; R Shane Tubbs; Koh-Ichi Yamaki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-07

10.  An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adil Asghar; Ananya Priya; Kumar Satish Ravi; Joe Iwanaga; R Shane Tubbs; Shagufta Naaz; Padamjeet Panchal
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.