Mary C Sheehan1, Thomas A Burke2, Ana Navas-Acien3, Patrick N Breysse3, John McGready4, Mary A Fox2. 1. Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America (USA). 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA . 3. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA . 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA .
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine biomarkers of methylmercury (MeHg) intake in women and infants from seafood-consuming populations globally and characterize the comparative risk of fetal developmental neurotoxicity. METHODS: A search was conducted of the published literature reporting total mercury (Hg) in hair and blood in women and infants. These biomarkers are validated proxy measures of MeHg, a neurotoxin found primarily in seafood. Average and high-end biomarkers were extracted, stratified by seafood consumption context, and pooled by category. Medians for average and high-end pooled distributions were compared with the reference level established by a joint expert committee of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). FINDINGS: Selection criteria were met by 164 studies of women and infants from 43 countries. Pooled average biomarkers suggest an intake of MeHg several times over the FAO/WHO reference in fish-consuming riparians living near small-scale gold mining and well over the reference in consumers of marine mammals in Arctic regions. In coastal regions of south-eastern Asia, the western Pacific and the Mediterranean, average biomarkers approach the reference. Although the two former groups have a higher risk of neurotoxicity than the latter, coastal regions are home to the largest number at risk. High-end biomarkers across all categories indicate MeHg intake is in excess of the reference value. CONCLUSION: There is a need for policies to reduce Hg exposure among women and infants and for surveillance in high-risk populations, the majority of which live in low-and middle-income countries.
OBJECTIVE: To examine biomarkers of methylmercury (MeHg) intake in women and infants from seafood-consuming populations globally and characterize the comparative risk of fetal developmental neurotoxicity. METHODS: A search was conducted of the published literature reporting total mercury (Hg) in hair and blood in women and infants. These biomarkers are validated proxy measures of MeHg, a neurotoxin found primarily in seafood. Average and high-end biomarkers were extracted, stratified by seafood consumption context, and pooled by category. Medians for average and high-end pooled distributions were compared with the reference level established by a joint expert committee of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). FINDINGS: Selection criteria were met by 164 studies of women and infants from 43 countries. Pooled average biomarkers suggest an intake of MeHg several times over the FAO/WHO reference in fish-consuming riparians living near small-scale gold mining and well over the reference in consumers of marine mammals in Arctic regions. In coastal regions of south-eastern Asia, the western Pacific and the Mediterranean, average biomarkers approach the reference. Although the two former groups have a higher risk of neurotoxicity than the latter, coastal regions are home to the largest number at risk. High-end biomarkers across all categories indicate MeHg intake is in excess of the reference value. CONCLUSION: There is a need for policies to reduce Hg exposure among women and infants and for surveillance in high-risk populations, the majority of which live in low-and middle-income countries.
Authors: Elisabeth C Oliveira Santos; Volney de Magalhães Câmara; Edilson da Silva Brabo; Edvaldo Carlos Brito Loureiro; Iracina Maura de Jesus; Kleber Fayal; Fernanda Sagica Journal: Cad Saude Publica Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 1.632
Authors: Margaret R Karagas; Anna L Choi; Emily Oken; Milena Horvat; Rita Schoeny; Elizabeth Kamai; Whitney Cowell; Philippe Grandjean; Susan Korrick Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: K Ask Björnberg; M Vahter; K Petersson-Grawé; A Glynn; S Cnattingius; P O Darnerud; S Atuma; M Aune; W Becker; M Berglund Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rejane C Marques; José V E Bernardi; José G Dórea; Katiane G Brandão; Lucélia Bueno; Renata S Leão; Olaf Malm Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fei Xue; Claudia Holzman; Mohammad Hossein Rahbar; Kay Trosko; Lawrence Fischer Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Wendy McKelvey; R Charon Gwynn; Nancy Jeffery; Daniel Kass; Lorna E Thorpe; Renu K Garg; Christopher D Palmer; Patrick J Parsons Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Pierre J Obeid; Souha A Fares; Ghada N Farhat; Bilal El-Khoury; Rana M Nassif; John El-Nakat; Hassan R Dhaini Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Flávio Mnaoel Rodrigues Da Silva-Junior; Ritta M Oleinski; Antonia E S Azevedo; Kátia C M C Monroe; Marina Dos Santos; Tatiane Britto Da Silveira; Adrianne Maria Netto De Oliveira; Maria Cristina Flores Soares; Tatiana Da Silva Pereira Journal: Environ Geochem Health Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 4.609
Authors: V F Taylor; K L Buckman; E A Seelen; N M Mazrui; P H Balcom; R P Mason; C Y Chen Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Matthew O Gribble; Aniruddha Deshpande; Wendy B Stephan; Candis M Hunter; Richard S Weisman Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 6.498