Literature DB >> 24700647

A comparison of the generalized gamma and exponentiated Weibull distributions.

Christopher Cox1, Matthew Matheson.   

Abstract

This paper provides a comparison of the three-parameter exponentiated Weibull (EW) and generalized gamma (GG) distributions. The connection between these two different families is that the hazard functions of both have the four standard shapes (increasing, decreasing, bathtub, and arc shaped), and in fact, the shape of the hazard is the same for identical values of the three parameters. For a given EW distribution, we define a matching GG using simulation and also by matching the 5 (th) , 50 (th) , and 95 (th) percentiles. We compare EW and matching GG distributions graphically and using the Kullback-Leibler distance. We find that the survival functions for the EW and matching GG are graphically indistinguishable, and only the hazard functions can sometimes be seen to be slightly different. The Kullback-Leibler distances are very small and decrease with increasing sample size. We conclude that the similarity between the two distributions is striking, and therefore, the EW represents a convenient alternative to the GG with the identical richness of hazard behavior. More importantly, these results suggest that having the four basic hazard shapes may to some extent be an important structural characteristic of any family of distributions.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exponentiated Weibull distribution; generalized gamma distribution; parametric survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700647      PMCID: PMC4125467          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Parametric survival analysis and taxonomy of hazard functions for the generalized gamma distribution.

Authors:  Christopher Cox; Haitao Chu; Michael F Schneider; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The generalized F distribution: an umbrella for parametric survival analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Cox
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Application of a hazard-based visual predictive check to evaluate parametric hazard models.

Authors:  Yeamin Huh; Matthew M Hutmacher
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Exponentiated Weibull regression for time-to-event data.

Authors:  Shahedul A Khan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A clinical trial design using the concept of proportional time using the generalized gamma ratio distribution.

Authors:  Milind A Phadnis; James B Wetmore; Matthew S Mayo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Associations of progression to diabetes and regression to normal glucose tolerance with development of cardiovascular and microvascular disease among people with impaired glucose tolerance: a secondary analysis of the 30 year Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study.

Authors:  Yanyan Chen; Ping Zhang; Jinping Wang; Qiuhong Gong; Yali An; Xin Qian; Bo Zhang; Hui Li; Edward W Gregg; Peter H Bennett; Guangwei Li
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Complex Survival System Modeling for Risk Assessment of Infant Mortality Using a Parametric Approach.

Authors:  Hang Chen; Maryam Sadiq; Zishen Song
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab as a maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced, unresectable, stage Ⅲ nsclc in china.

Authors:  Xiaotong Jiang; Jinyu Chen; Min Zheng; Hanxue Jia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Challenges of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of non-proportional hazards to aid decision making: Application to a melanoma network.

Authors:  Suzanne C Freeman; Nicola J Cooper; Alex J Sutton; Michael J Crowther; James R Carpenter; Neil Hawkins
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.