INTRODUCTION: Currently, most of renal tumors are small, low grade, with a slow growth rate, a low metastatic potential, and with up to 30 % of these tumors being benign on the final pathology. Moreover, they are often diagnosed in elderly patients with preexisting medical comorbidities in whom the underlying medical conditions may pose a greater risk of death than the small renal mass. Concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of patients with indolent small renal tumors have led to an increasing interest in minimally invasive, ablative as an alternative to extirpative interventions for selected patients. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview about the state of the art in radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound, and cryoablation in the clinical management of renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: A PubMed wide the literature search of was conducted. RESULTS: International consensus panels recommend ablative techniques in patients who are unfit for surgery, who are not considered candidates for or elect against elective surveillance, and who have small renal masses. The most often used techniques are cryoablation and RFA. These ablative techniques offer potentially curative outcomes while conferring several advantages over extirpative surgery, including improved patient procedural tolerance, faster recovery, preservation of renal function, and reduction in the risk of intraoperative and postsurgical complications. While it is likely that outcomes associated with ablative modalities will improve with further advances in technology, their application will expand to more elective indications as longer-term efficacy data become available. CONCLUSION: Ablative techniques pose a valid treatment option in selected patients.
INTRODUCTION: Currently, most of renal tumors are small, low grade, with a slow growth rate, a low metastatic potential, and with up to 30 % of these tumors being benign on the final pathology. Moreover, they are often diagnosed in elderly patients with preexisting medical comorbidities in whom the underlying medical conditions may pose a greater risk of death than the small renal mass. Concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of patients with indolent small renal tumors have led to an increasing interest in minimally invasive, ablative as an alternative to extirpative interventions for selected patients. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview about the state of the art in radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound, and cryoablation in the clinical management of renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: A PubMed wide the literature search of was conducted. RESULTS: International consensus panels recommend ablative techniques in patients who are unfit for surgery, who are not considered candidates for or elect against elective surveillance, and who have small renal masses. The most often used techniques are cryoablation and RFA. These ablative techniques offer potentially curative outcomes while conferring several advantages over extirpative surgery, including improved patient procedural tolerance, faster recovery, preservation of renal function, and reduction in the risk of intraoperative and postsurgical complications. While it is likely that outcomes associated with ablative modalities will improve with further advances in technology, their application will expand to more elective indications as longer-term efficacy data become available. CONCLUSION: Ablative techniques pose a valid treatment option in selected patients.
Authors: Ryan F Paterson; Eric Barret; Tibério M Siqueira; Thomas A Gardner; Jahangir Tavakkoli; Victor V Rao; Narendra T Sanghvi; Liang Cheng; Arieh L Shalhav Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Patricia W T Beemster; Kurdo Barwari; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Hessel Wijkstra; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Robert W Ritchie; Tom A Leslie; Gareth D H Turner; Ian S D Roberts; Leonardo D'Urso; Devis Collura; Andrea Demarchi; Giovanni Muto; Mark E Sullivan Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Thomas D Atwell; Matthew R Callstrom; Michael A Farrell; Grant D Schmit; David A Woodrum; Bradley C Leibovich; George K Chow; David E Patterson; Michael L Blute; J William Charboneau Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Rebecca L O'Malley; Aaron D Berger; Jamie A Kanofsky; Courtney K Phillips; Michael Stifelman; Samir S Taneja Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: John B Malcolm; Tristan T Berry; Michael B Williams; Joshua E Logan; Robert W Given; Raymond S Lance; Bethany Barone; Sarah Shaves; Harlan Vingan; Michael D Fabrizio Journal: J Endourol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Ryan M Hegg; Grant D Schmit; Stephen A Boorjian; Robert J McDonald; A Nicholas Kurup; Adam J Weisbrod; Matthew R Callstrom; Thomas D Atwell; R Houston Thompson Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich; Ghulam Abbas; Mang Chen; Hiran C Fernando; William E Gooding; Matthew J Schuchert; Sebastien Gilbert; Neil A Christie; Rodney J Landreneau Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Chiara Floridi; Irene De Bernardi; Federico Fontana; Alessandra Muollo; Anna Maria Ierardi; Andrea Agostini; Paolo Fonio; Ettore Squillaci; Luca Brunese; Carlo Fugazzola; Gianpaolo Carrafiello Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 3.469