Literature DB >> 23123377

Percutaneous renal cryoablation after partial nephrectomy: technical feasibility, complications and outcomes.

Ryan M Hegg1, Grant D Schmit, Stephen A Boorjian, Robert J McDonald, A Nicholas Kurup, Adam J Weisbrod, Matthew R Callstrom, Thomas D Atwell, R Houston Thompson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment of locally recurrent or de novo tumors in the ipsilateral kidney after partial nephrectomy represents a management dilemma. Percutaneous renal cryoablation offers a minimally invasive treatment option in such cases. We review our single institution experience with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors after partial nephrectomy for technical feasibility, complications and outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and January 2012, 48 patients underwent percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of 68 ipsilateral renal tumors after previous partial nephrectomy. Oncologic outcomes, complications (Clavien-Dindo classification system) and renal function were evaluated.
RESULTS: Median maximal diameter of the treated renal tumors was 2.5 cm (range 1.2 to 5.4). All cryoablation procedures were considered technically successful. Of the 54 biopsy proven or suspected renal cell carcinomas with 3 or more months of computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging followup after cryoablation (median 19, range 3 to 61), 5 cases (9.3%) had local tumor recurrence. Major (grade 3 or greater) complications developed after 3 (5.7%) cryoablation procedures and there were no perioperative deaths. Median change in patient estimated glomerular filtration rate after renal cryoablation was -1.5 ml per minute. No patients required dialysis in the perioperative period, while 2 with stage 4 chronic kidney disease at the time of ablation became dialysis dependent at 5 and 23 months after treatment, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous renal cryoablation after ipsilateral partial nephrectomy is technically feasible, has a low rate of major complications, provides relative preservation of renal function and demonstrates acceptable short-term oncologic outcomes in this challenging population.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123377     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  Complications of image-guided thermal ablation of liver and kidney neoplasms.

Authors:  Kyung Rae Kim; Sarah Thomas
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  The contemporary role of ablative treatment approaches in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): focus on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and cryoablation.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Nils Kroeger; Uwe Zimmermann; Martin Burchardt; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Current strategies to diagnose and manage positive surgical margins and local recurrence after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Daniele Amparore; Cosimo Gentile; Riccardo Bertolo; Selcuk Erdem; Alexandre Ingels; Michele Marchioni; Constantijn H J Muselaers; Onder Kara; Laura Marandino; Nicola Pavan; Eduard Roussel; Angela Pecoraro; Fabio Crocerossa; Giuseppe Torre; Riccardo Campi; Pasquale Ditonno
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 4.  Indications for biopsy and the current status of focal therapy for renal tumours.

Authors:  Ricardo R N Leão; Patrick O Richard; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.