Literature DB >> 24700225

Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair.

Dimitri Barski1, Thomas Otto2, Holger Gerullis3.   

Abstract

In this review we focus on the transvaginal meshes used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair and possible changes in application after the first FDA warning in 2008. A systematic review of the literature was performed. The data was reviewed for reoperation rates and complications following the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 11 randomized controlled and 9 prospective studies with 2,289 patients (most POP-Q ≥ II, median follow-up 12 mos) were included. The results showed a mean total complication rate of 27% in anterior, 20% in posterior, and 40% in combined mesh repair group (ns). Grade ≥ III complications occurred in 8% anterior, 3.5% posterior, and 13% combined (p < 0.05) mesh repairs. No differences were found for reoperation rates for POP (2% to 3%). The following risk factors for complications were identified: operative technique, surgeon experience, previous prolapse repair, concomitant hysterectomy, total mesh repair, mesh properties (light weight, collagen coating were positive factors), young age, sexual activity, and smoking. Due to high complication rates (especially mesh erosion, voiding dysfunction, and dyspareunia) a careful individualized selection of patients and materials, education of patients, and elimination of identified risk factors are urgent prior to implantation of vaginal meshes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  24 in total

1.  The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  John R Miklos; Orawee Chinthakanan; Robert D Moore; Gretchen K Mitchell; Sheena Favors; Deborah R Karp; Gina M Northington; Gladys M Nogueiras; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse.

Authors:  Alexis A Dieter; Marcella G Willis-Gray; Alison C Weidner; Anthony G Visco; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Quality of Life, Sexuality, Anatomical Results and Side-effects of Implantation of an Alloplastic Mesh for Cystocele Correction at Follow-up after 36 Months.

Authors:  Christian Fünfgeld; Margit Stehle; Brigit Henne; Jan Kaufhold; Dirk Watermann; Markus Grebe; Mathias Mengel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Transvaginal repair of stage III-IV cystocele using a lightweight mesh: safety and 36-month outcome.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Majid Brouziyne; Gérard Priou; Guy Devoldère; Gérard Marie; Joël Renaudie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Cæcilie Krogsgaard Tolstrup; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Gynaecological Prolapse Surgery in Very Old Female Patients: A Case-Control Study on Co-Morbidity and Surgical Complications.

Authors:  A R Mothes; T Lehmann; A Kwetkat; M P Radosa; I B Runnebaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Friedman; Guy D Eslick; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh: intermediate results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Vincent Letouzey; Daniela Ulrich; Eva Balenbois; Arnaud Cornille; Renaud de Tayrac; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Megumi Akiyama; Gayle Allenback; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Indian Contribution.

Authors:  Gillian A Ryan; Nikhil C Purandare; Simran A Ganeriwal; Chittaranjan N Purandare
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.