PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and refractive error in Korean adolescents. METHODS: A total of 2038 adolescent aged 13 to 18 years, who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2008 to 2011 underwent refractive examination using an autorefractor. Serum 25(OH)D concentration and other potential risk factors were examined. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between serum 25(OH)D and spherical equivalent (SE). RESULTS: Among the participants, 80.1% had myopia (-0.5 diopters [D] or more myopic) and 8.9% had high myopia (-6.0 D or more myopia). Age, total energy/Ca intake, area of residence, parental income, and smoking experience were significantly different among groups according to SE (All, P < 0.05). The age-adjusted distribution of SE according to serum 25(OH)D concentration showed a positive relationship (r = 0.067, P = 0.012). The myopia group had a significant positive relationship between SE and serum 25(OH)D tertile concentration (P = 0.020), whereas the nonmyopia group did not have any significant relationship (P = 0.599). In multiple linear regression analyses, SE was significantly associated with low serum 25(OH)D concentration after adjustment for area of residence, parental income, total energy intake, dietary Ca intake, milk consumption, and smoking experience (P = 0.047). The prevalence of high myopia was significantly associated with the lowest tertile of serum 25(OH)D concentration after adjustment for the confounding factors (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Low serum 25(OH)D concentration was associated with myopia prevalence in Korean adolescents. This relationship was particularly notable in adolescents with high myopia.
PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and refractive error in Korean adolescents. METHODS: A total of 2038 adolescent aged 13 to 18 years, who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2008 to 2011 underwent refractive examination using an autorefractor. Serum 25(OH)D concentration and other potential risk factors were examined. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between serum 25(OH)D and spherical equivalent (SE). RESULTS: Among the participants, 80.1% had myopia (-0.5 diopters [D] or more myopic) and 8.9% had high myopia (-6.0 D or more myopia). Age, total energy/Ca intake, area of residence, parental income, and smoking experience were significantly different among groups according to SE (All, P < 0.05). The age-adjusted distribution of SE according to serum 25(OH)D concentration showed a positive relationship (r = 0.067, P = 0.012). The myopia group had a significant positive relationship between SE and serum 25(OH)D tertile concentration (P = 0.020), whereas the nonmyopia group did not have any significant relationship (P = 0.599). In multiple linear regression analyses, SE was significantly associated with low serum 25(OH)D concentration after adjustment for area of residence, parental income, total energy intake, dietary Ca intake, milk consumption, and smoking experience (P = 0.047). The prevalence of high myopia was significantly associated with the lowest tertile of serum 25(OH)D concentration after adjustment for the confounding factors (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Low serum 25(OH)D concentration was associated with myopia prevalence in Korean adolescents. This relationship was particularly notable in adolescents with high myopia.
Authors: G E Nam; B E Hwang; Y-C Lee; J-S Paik; S-W Yang; Y-H Chun; K Han; Y G Park; S H Park Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Katie M Williams; Seyhan Yazar; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Alex W Hewitt; Cathy Williams; Jie Jin Wang; Pik-Fang Kho; Seang Mei Saw; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Yin Wong; Tin Aung; Terri L Young; J Willem L Tideman; Jost B Jonas; Paul Mitchell; Robert Wojciechowski; Dwight Stambolian; Pirro Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; David A Mackey; Robyn M Lucas; Stuart MacGregor Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Yi Lu; Pik Fang Kho; Alex W Hewitt; H-Erich Wichmann; Seyhan Yazar; Dwight Stambolian; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Robert Wojciechowski; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; David A Mackey; Stuart MacGregor Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Milly S Tedja; Annechien E G Haarman; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Jaakko Kaprio; David A Mackey; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Christopher J Hammond; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jeremy A Guggenheim; Cathy Williams; Kate Northstone; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Beate St Pourcain; George McMahon; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 4.799