Literature DB >> 24699301

Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.

Mary Ellen Wechter1, Jasmine Mohd2, Javier F Magrina3, Jeffrey L Cornella3, Paul M Magtibay3, Jeffrey R Wilson4, Rosanne M Kho3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Mayo Clinic Arizona. PATIENTS: All 1155 patients who underwent robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery between March 2004 and December 2009 were included. Patients were primarily white (94.3%), with a mean (SD) age of 51.5 (15.4) years, and were overweight, with body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 (6.8).
INTERVENTIONS: Risk of complications, overall and according to Clavien-Dindo grade, and incidence of specific complications were analyzed. Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgical procedures were categorized postoperatively according to case type as benign simple (e.g., oophorectomy, simple hysterectomy) in 552 (47.8%) patients, benign complex (e.g., excision of invasive endometriosis) in 262 (22.7%), urogynecologic in 121 (10.5%), and oncologic in 220 (19.1%).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.2% of patients. Postoperative complications of any type occurred in 18.4% of patients. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 2.7%. Urologic complications were more common in urogynecologic cases (5.8%) as compared with benign simple (0.5%), benign complex (2.7%), and oncologic (3.2%). Bleeding complications were most common in oncologic cases (5%). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications occurred in 5.2% of patients overall, and were >3-fold likely to occur in benign complex, urogynecologic, and oncologic cases than in benign simple cases. When adjusted for age, BMI, estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and previous pelvic surgery, complications were nearly twice as common for benign complex (odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7), urogynecologic (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.4), and oncologic (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1) cases as for benign simple cases, although weakly significant. Case type, BMI, estimated blood loss, and length of stay remained important factors in predicting postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery varies according to case type. Defining the role of patient and surgical variables such as case type in the occurrence of complications may help in identification of cases with increased risk, to improve patient counseling and surgical outcome.
Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Gynecologic surgery; Gynecology; Postoperative; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699301     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  8 in total

1.  Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Mallika Anand; Amy L Weaver; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; Emanuel C Trabuco; John A Occhino; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tae-Han Kim; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yeon-Ju Huh; Young-Gil Son; Ji-Ho Park; Jun-Young Yang; Seong-Ho Kong; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Ksenija Slankamenac; Pierre Alain Clavien; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Lynette Johnson; W Douglas Bunn; Loan Nguyen; Jessica Rice; Minakshi Raj; Mary J Cunningham
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-03

4.  Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Karim H Marzouk; Daniel D Sjoberg; Justin Lee; Sheri M Donat; Jonathan A Coleman; Andrew Vickers; Harry W Herr; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Toward a More Sensitive Endpoint for Assessing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Comparison Between Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Dengyu Feng; Tenghui Zhang; Lili Gu; Weiming Zhu; Zhen Guo; Yi Li; Jianfeng Gong; Ning Li; Jieshou Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease.

Authors:  Celine Lönnerfors; Petur Reynisson; Barbara Geppert; Jan Persson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-13

7.  Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.

Authors:  Natalia Povolotskaya; Robert Woolas; Dirk Brinkmann
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-15

8.  Complication reports for robotic surgery using three arms by a single surgeon at a single institution.

Authors:  Ching-Hui Chen; Huang-Hui Chen; Wei-Min Liu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.