Literature DB >> 24699200

Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

D R Dance1, K C Young.   

Abstract

The UK, European and IAEA protocols for breast dosimetry in mammography use tabulations of conversion factors, which relate measurements of incident air kerma to the mean glandular dose to the breast. To supplement the existing tabulations, a Monte Carlo computer program has been used to calculate conversion factors for the high-energy spectra used for contrast enhanced digital mammography. The calculations were made for the x-ray spectra from a tungsten target (tube voltage range 40-50 kV) filtered by 0.28, 0.30 and 0.32 mm of copper, and from molybdenum and rhodium targets (tube voltage range 40-49 kV), each filtered by 0.30 mm of copper. The g-factors for all of these spectra were plotted for each breast thickness as a function of half value layer (HVL) and were found to lie on smooth curves within 0.3%. These reflect the fact that the characteristic x-rays present in the spectra from molybdenum and rhodium are heavily filtered and all the spectra are essentially Bremsstrahlung. As a consequence, the s-factor previously used in the dosimetry protocols to adjust for different target/filter combinations can be taken as unity for all of the spectra considered. Tables of g-factors and c-factors are provided for breast thicknesses in the range 20-110 mm and HVLs in the range 2.4-3.6 mm of aluminium. The tables of c-factors are given for breast glandularities in the range 0.1%-100% and for typical glandularities for women in the age bands 40-49 and 50-64 attending the UK national breast screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699200     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.

Authors:  Antonio Sarno; David R Dance; Ruben E van Engen; Kenneth C Young; Paolo Russo; Francesca Di Lillo; Giovanni Mettivier; Kristina Bliznakova; Baowei Fei; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of the energy for Breast monochromatic absorption X-ray Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Pasquale Delogu; Vittorio Di Trapani; Luca Brombal; Giovanni Mettivier; Angelo Taibi; Piernicola Oliva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging.

Authors:  David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Two-Center Prospective Comparison.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Andrea Cozzi; Simone Schiaffino; Francesco Sardanelli; Francesca Caumo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.

Authors:  Tien-Yu Chang; Kuan-Jen Lai; Chun-Yuan Tu; Jay Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.