T Taoka1, M Fujioka2, M Sakamoto3, T Miyasaka3, T Akashi3, T Ochi3, S Hori3, M Uchikoshi4, J Xu5, K Kichikawa3. 1. From the Department of Radiology (T.T., M.S., T.M., T.A., T.O., S.H., K.K.) ttaoka@naramed-u.ac.jp. 2. Critical Care Medicine (M.F.), Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan. 3. From the Department of Radiology (T.T., M.S., T.M., T.A., T.O., S.H., K.K.). 4. Siemens Japan KK (M.U.), Tokyo Japan. 5. Siemens Medical Solutions USA (J.X.), New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion kurtosis is a statistical measure for quantifying the deviation of the water diffusion profile from a Gaussian distribution. The current study evaluated the time course of diffusion kurtosis in patients with cerebral infarctions, including perforator, white matter, cortical, and watershed infarctions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 31 patients, representing 52 observations of lesions. The duration between the onset and imaging ranged from 3 hours to 122 days. Lesions were categorized into 4 groups listed above. Diffusion kurtosis images were acquired with b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm(2) applied in 30 directions; variables including DWI signal, ADC, fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial kurtosis, and axial kurtosis, were obtained. The time courses of the relative values (lesion versus contralateral) for these variables were evaluated, and the pseudonormalization period was calculated. RESULTS: Diffusion kurtosis was highest immediately after the onset of infarction. Trend curves showed that kurtosis decreased with time after onset. Pseudonormalization for radial/axial kurtosis occurred at 13.2/59.9 days for perforator infarctions, 33.1/40.6 days for white matter infarctions, 34.8/35.9 days for cortical infarctions, and 34.1/28.2 days after watershed infarctions. For perforator infarctions, pseudonormalization occurred in the following order: radial kurtosis, ADC, axial kurtosis, and DWI. CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion kurtosis variables in lesions increased early after infarction and decreased with time. Information provided by diffusion kurtosis imaging, including axial and radial kurtosis, seems helpful in conducting a detailed evaluation of the age of infarction, in combination with T2WI, DWI, and ADC.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Diffusion kurtosis is a statistical measure for quantifying the deviation of the water diffusion profile from a Gaussian distribution. The current study evaluated the time course of diffusion kurtosis in patients with cerebral infarctions, including perforator, white matter, cortical, and watershed infarctions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 31 patients, representing 52 observations of lesions. The duration between the onset and imaging ranged from 3 hours to 122 days. Lesions were categorized into 4 groups listed above. Diffusion kurtosis images were acquired with b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm(2) applied in 30 directions; variables including DWI signal, ADC, fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial kurtosis, and axial kurtosis, were obtained. The time courses of the relative values (lesion versus contralateral) for these variables were evaluated, and the pseudonormalization period was calculated. RESULTS:Diffusion kurtosis was highest immediately after the onset of infarction. Trend curves showed that kurtosis decreased with time after onset. Pseudonormalization for radial/axial kurtosis occurred at 13.2/59.9 days for perforator infarctions, 33.1/40.6 days for white matter infarctions, 34.8/35.9 days for cortical infarctions, and 34.1/28.2 days after watershed infarctions. For perforator infarctions, pseudonormalization occurred in the following order: radial kurtosis, ADC, axial kurtosis, and DWI. CONCLUSIONS:Diffusion kurtosis variables in lesions increased early after infarction and decreased with time. Information provided by diffusion kurtosis imaging, including axial and radial kurtosis, seems helpful in conducting a detailed evaluation of the age of infarction, in combination with T2WI, DWI, and ADC.
Authors: Hubertus Axer; David Grässel; Dirk Brämer; Sabine Fitzek; Werner A Kaiser; Otto W Witte; Clemens Fitzek Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Edward S Hui; Els Fieremans; Jens H Jensen; Ali Tabesh; Wuwei Feng; Leonardo Bonilha; Maria V Spampinato; Robert Adams; Joseph A Helpern Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jens H Jensen; Maria F Falangola; Caixia Hu; Ali Tabesh; Otto Rapalino; Calvin Lo; Joseph A Helpern Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: L H Schwamm; W J Koroshetz; A G Sorensen; B Wang; W A Copen; R Budzik; G Rordorf; F S Buonanno; P W Schaefer; R G Gonzalez Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: James D Eastwood; Stefan T Engelter; James F MacFall; David M Delong; James M Provenzale Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Tietze; M B Hansen; L Østergaard; S N Jespersen; R Sangill; T E Lund; M Geneser; M Hjelm; B Hansen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sudhakar Tummala; Bhaswati Roy; Ruchi Vig; Bumhee Park; Daniel W Kang; Mary A Woo; Ravi Aysola; Ronald M Harper; Rajesh Kumar Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2017 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Myrle M Stouten-Kemperman; Michiel B de Ruiter; Matthan W A Caan; Willem Boogerd; Martijn J Kerst; Liesbeth Reneman; Sanne B Schagen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Andrew H Cohen; Rongpin Wang; Molly Wilkinson; Patrick MacDonald; Ashley R Lim; Emi Takahashi Journal: Int J Dev Neurosci Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 2.457