| Literature DB >> 24696193 |
Dilhan İlgüy1, Mehmet İlgüy1, Erdoğan Fişekçioğlu1, Semanur Dölekoğlu1, Nilüfer Ersan1.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between articular eminence inclination, height, and thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa (RGF) according to age and gender and to assess condyle morphology including incidental findings of osseous characteristics associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24696193 PMCID: PMC3947926 DOI: 10.1155/2014/761714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1(a) The points and planes used in this study, (b) the best-fit line method, and (c) the top-roof line method. F: Frankfort horizontal, F1: the parallel line to the F passing through the highest point of the condylar process, F2: the parallel line to the F passing through the highest point of the fossa, Ebf plane: the best-fit plane of the articular eminence inclination connecting the point, at which the F1 line cut the eminence posterior surface, Etr plane: the plane passing through the highest point of the condylar process and the highest point of the condylar process, and Eh: Eminence height.
Figure 2The coronal condyle morphology: (a) convex, (b) round, (c) flat, and (d) angled and other.
Figure 3The sagittal condyle morphology: (a) without osteoarthritis (OA), (b) flattening, (c) erosion, and (d) osteophyte.
The articular eminence and RGF thickness measurements according to gender.
| Male | Female |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Best-fit line (°) | 49.66 ± 6.88 | 47.58 ± 6.75 |
|
| Top-roof line (°) | 40.19 ± 6.58 | 37.99 ± 6.00 |
|
| RGF thickness (mm) | 1.26 ± 0.42 | 1.24 ± 0.38 |
|
| Height (mm) | 7.33 ± 1.26 | 6.69 ± 1.16 |
|
Student's t-test; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05.
The articular eminence and RGF thickness measurements according to age groups.
| Age groups |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 | 30–39 | 40–49 | 50–59 | ≥60 | ||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Best-fit line (°) | 46.02 ± 7.65 | 54.22 ± 6.02 | 46.45 ± 6.06 | 46.91 ± 5.16 | 48.59 ± 6.42 |
|
| Top-roof line (°) | 38.17 ± 7.07 | 44.73 ± 7.12 | 36.71 ± 5.0 | 37.17 ± 4.33 | 38.08 ± 5.18 |
|
| RGF thickness (mm) | 1.20 ± 0.32 | 1.37 ± 0.48 | 1.49 ± 0.47 | 1.16 ± 0.37 | 1.18 ± 0.33 |
|
| Art eminence height (mm) | 6.64 ± 1.47 | 7.19 ± 1.09 | 6.66 ± 1.35 | 6.91 ± 1.05 | 7.11 ± 1.19 |
|
One-way ANOVA test; **P < 0.01.
The mean values of the articular eminence and roof of the glenoid fossa thickness according to sagittal condyle morphology.
| Sagittal condyle morphology |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without OA | With OA | ||||
| Flattened | Osteophyte | Erosion | |||
| Best-fit line (°) | 48.50 ± 7.0 | 48.06 ± 6.90 | 50.13 ± 5.31 | 48.44 ± 7.25 |
|
| Top-roof line (°) | 39.15 ± 6.98 | 38.6 ± 5.94 | 38.41 ± 3.01 | 38.04 ± 6.72 |
|
| RGF thickness (mm) | 1.24 ± 0.37 | 1.21 ± 0.39 | 1.59 ± 0.28 | 1.48 ± 0.78 |
|
| Height (mm) | 6.74 ± 1.10 | 7.05 ± 1.33 | 7.07 ± 0.91 | 7.44 ± 1.82 |
|
Kruskal-Wallis test; *P < 0.05.