Literature DB >> 24695920

Does anterior laxity of the uninjured knee influence clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction?

Sung-Jae Kim1, Su-Keon Lee1, Sung-Hwan Kim1, Seong-Hun Kim1, Jong-Soon Kim2, Min Jung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the postoperative outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the anterior laxity of the uninjured knee.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 163 patients who had undergone unilateral ACL reconstruction from January 2002 to August 2009. Patients were divided into three groups according to the anterior laxity of the contralateral, normal knee in 30° of knee flexion as measured with a KT2000 arthrometer exerting a force of 134 N: <5 mm for Group 1, 5 to 7.5 mm for Group 2, and >7.5 mm for Group 3. Anterior laxity of the uninjured knee was assessed preoperatively, and anterior laxity of the reconstructed knee was assessed at twenty-four months postoperatively. Anterior stability of the knee was also assessed with use of the Lachman and pivot-shift tests. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.
RESULTS: The three groups differed significantly with respect to the postoperative side-to-side difference in anterior laxity (p = 0.015), Lysholm score (p < 0.001), and IKDC subjective score (p < 0.001). The mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity of the reconstructed knee was 2.1 ± 1.3 mm in Group 1, 2.2 ± 1.3 mm in Group 2, and 2.9 ± 1.4 mm in Group 3. The postoperative Lysholm score was 91.8 ± 4.5 in Group 1, 90.3 ± 5.5 in Group 2, and 85.4 ± 6.6 in Group 3. The postoperative IKDC subjective score was 89.3 ± 6.4 in Group 1, 87.9 ± 6.0 in Group 2, and 82.6 ± 8.2 in Group 3. Post hoc testing showed that Group 3 had significantly greater anterior laxity (p ≤ 0.039) and lower functional scores (p ≤ 0.001) compared with Groups 1 and 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater anterior laxity of the uninjured knee was associated with poorer stability and functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Excessive anterior laxity of the uninjured knee thus appears to represent a risk factor for inferior outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695920     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

Review 1.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Global rotation has high sensitivity in ACL lesions within stress MRI.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Ana Leal; Hélder Pereira; Abdala Skaf; Sérgio Rodrigues-Gomes; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Rogério Pereira
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Chong Hyuk Choi; Sung-Hwan Kim; Su-Keon Lee; Wonyong Lee; Taeyup Kim; Min Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Female sex is associated with greater rotatory knee laxity in collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Thomas R Pfeiffer; Ajay C Kanakamedala; Elmar Herbst; Kanto Nagai; Conor Murphy; Jeremy M Burnham; Adam Popchak; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.