Literature DB >> 24695406

Deconvolving tumor purity and ploidy by integrating copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity.

Yi Li1, Xiaohui Xie2.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the study of cancer genomes. However, the reads obtained from NGS of tumor samples often consist of a mixture of normal and tumor cells, which themselves can be of multiple clonal types. A prominent problem in the analysis of cancer genome sequencing data is deconvolving the mixture to identify the reads associated with tumor cells or a particular subclone of tumor cells. Solving the problem is, however, challenging because of the so-called 'identifiability problem', where different combinations of tumor purity and ploidy often explain the sequencing data equally well.
RESULTS: We propose a new model to resolve the identifiability problem by integrating two types of sequencing information-somatic copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity-within a unified probabilistic framework. We derive algorithms to solve our model, and implement them in a software package called PyLOH. We benchmark the performance of PyLOH using both simulated data and 12 breast cancer sequencing datasets and show that PyLOH outperforms existing methods in disambiguating the identifiability problem and estimating tumor purity.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The PyLOH package is written in Python and is publicly available at https://github.com/uci-cbcl/PyLOH. CONTACT: xhx@ics.uci.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695406      PMCID: PMC4103592          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  37 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number using oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Graham R Bignell; Jing Huang; Joel Greshock; Stephen Watt; Adam Butler; Sofie West; Mira Grigorova; Keith W Jones; Wen Wei; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Barbara Weber; Michael H Shapero; Richard Wooster
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  An integrated view of copy number and allelic alterations in the cancer genome using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Xiaojun Zhao; Cheng Li; J Guillermo Paez; Koei Chin; Pasi A Jänne; Tzu-Hsiu Chen; Luc Girard; John Minna; David Christiani; Chris Leo; Joe W Gray; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  R Sachidanandam; D Weissman; S C Schmidt; J M Kakol; L D Stein; G Marth; S Sherry; J C Mullikin; B J Mortimore; D L Willey; S E Hunt; C G Cole; P C Coggill; C M Rice; Z Ning; J Rogers; D R Bentley; P Y Kwok; E R Mardis; R T Yeh; B Schultz; L Cook; R Davenport; M Dante; L Fulton; L Hillier; R H Waterston; J D McPherson; B Gilman; S Schaffner; W J Van Etten; D Reich; J Higgins; M J Daly; B Blumenstiel; J Baldwin; N Stange-Thomann; M C Zody; L Linton; E S Lander; D Altshuler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis.

Authors:  E S Lander; M S Waterman
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Genome-wide detection of allelic imbalance using human SNPs and high-density DNA arrays.

Authors:  R Mei; P C Galipeau; C Prass; A Berno; G Ghandour; N Patil; R K Wolff; M S Chee; B J Reid; D J Lockhart
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Loss-of-heterozygosity analysis of small-cell lung carcinomas using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  K Lindblad-Toh; D M Tanenbaum; M J Daly; E Winchester; W O Lui; A Villapakkam; S E Stanton; C Larsson; T J Hudson; B E Johnson; E S Lander; M Meyerson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  18 in total

1.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Venkatraman E Seshan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Evolution of Neoantigen Landscape during Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Valsamo Anagnostou; Kellie N Smith; Patrick M Forde; Noushin Niknafs; Rohit Bhattacharya; James White; Theresa Zhang; Vilmos Adleff; Jillian Phallen; Neha Wali; Carolyn Hruban; Violeta B Guthrie; Kristen Rodgers; Jarushka Naidoo; Hyunseok Kang; William Sharfman; Christos Georgiades; Franco Verde; Peter Illei; Qing Kay Li; Edward Gabrielson; Malcolm V Brock; Cynthia A Zahnow; Stephen B Baylin; Robert B Scharpf; Julie R Brahmer; Rachel Karchin; Drew M Pardoll; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  MixClone: a mixture model for inferring tumor subclonal populations.

Authors:  Yi Li; Xiaohui Xie
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  CloneCNA: detecting subclonal somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-exome sequencing data.

Authors:  Zhenhua Yu; Ao Li; Minghui Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  An Improved Binary Differential Evolution Algorithm to Infer Tumor Phylogenetic Trees.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Bo Liao; Wen Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A hidden Markov modeling approach for identifying tumor subclones in next-generation sequencing studies.

Authors:  Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba; Paul S Albert; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  A simplicial complex-based approach to unmixing tumor progression data.

Authors:  Theodore Roman; Amir Nayyeri; Brittany Terese Fasy; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Medoidshift clustering applied to genomic bulk tumor data.

Authors:  Theodore Roman; Lu Xie; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.

Authors:  James X Sun; Yuting He; Eric Sanford; Meagan Montesion; Garrett M Frampton; Stéphane Vignot; Jean-Charles Soria; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Phil J Stephens; Doron Lipson; Roman Yelensky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Automated deconvolution of structured mixtures from heterogeneous tumor genomic data.

Authors:  Theodore Roman; Lu Xie; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.