H Peter Linder1, Nigel P Barker2. 1. Institute for Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, Zurich CH8008, Switzerland peter.linder@systbot.uzh.ch. 2. Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability of plant lineages to reach all continents contributes substantially to their evolutionary success. This is exemplified by the Poaceae, one of the most successful angiosperm families, in which most higher taxa (tribes, subfamilies) have global distributions. Due to the old age of the ocean basins relative to the major angiosperm radiations, this is only possible by means of long-distance dispersal (LDD), yet the attributes of lineages with successful LDD remain obscure. Polyploid species are over-represented in invasive floras and in the previously glaciated Arctic regions, and often have wider ecological tolerances than diploids; thus polyploidy is a candidate attribute of successful LDD. METHODS: The link between polyploidy and LDD was explored in the globally distributed grass subfamily Danthonioideae. An almost completely sampled and well-resolved species-level phylogeny of the danthonioids was used, and the available cytological information was assembled. The cytological evolution in the clade was inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) as implemented in ChromEvol. The biogeographical evolution in the clade was reconstructed using ML and Bayesian approaches. KEY RESULTS: Numerous increases in ploidy level are demonstrated. A Late Miocene-Pliocene cycle of polyploidy is associated with LDD, and in two cases (the Australian Rytidosperma and the American Danthonia) led to secondary polyploidy. While it is demonstrated that successful LDD is more likely in polyploid than in diploid lineages, a link between polyploidization events and LDD is not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that polyploids are more successful at LDD than diploids, and that the frequent polyploidy in the grasses might have facilitated the extensive dispersal among continents in the family, thus contributing to their evolutionary success.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability of plant lineages to reach all continents contributes substantially to their evolutionary success. This is exemplified by the Poaceae, one of the most successful angiosperm families, in which most higher taxa (tribes, subfamilies) have global distributions. Due to the old age of the ocean basins relative to the major angiosperm radiations, this is only possible by means of long-distance dispersal (LDD), yet the attributes of lineages with successful LDD remain obscure. Polyploid species are over-represented in invasive floras and in the previously glaciated Arctic regions, and often have wider ecological tolerances than diploids; thus polyploidy is a candidate attribute of successful LDD. METHODS: The link between polyploidy and LDD was explored in the globally distributed grass subfamily Danthonioideae. An almost completely sampled and well-resolved species-level phylogeny of the danthonioids was used, and the available cytological information was assembled. The cytological evolution in the clade was inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) as implemented in ChromEvol. The biogeographical evolution in the clade was reconstructed using ML and Bayesian approaches. KEY RESULTS: Numerous increases in ploidy level are demonstrated. A Late Miocene-Pliocene cycle of polyploidy is associated with LDD, and in two cases (the Australian Rytidosperma and the American Danthonia) led to secondary polyploidy. While it is demonstrated that successful LDD is more likely in polyploid than in diploid lineages, a link between polyploidization events and LDD is not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that polyploids are more successful at LDD than diploids, and that the frequent polyploidy in the grasses might have facilitated the extensive dispersal among continents in the family, thus contributing to their evolutionary success.
Authors: Mariska te Beest; Johannes J Le Roux; David M Richardson; Anne K Brysting; Jan Suda; Magdalena Kubesová; Petr Pysek Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Thomas J Givnish; Kendra C Millam; Austin R Mast; Thomas B Paterson; Terra J Theim; Andrew L Hipp; Jillian M Henss; James F Smith; Kenneth R Wood; Kenneth J Sytsma Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Yuannian Jiao; Norman J Wickett; Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam; André S Chanderbali; Lena Landherr; Paula E Ralph; Lynn P Tomsho; Yi Hu; Haiying Liang; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; Sandra W Clifton; Scott E Schlarbaum; Stephan C Schuster; Hong Ma; Jim Leebens-Mack; Claude W dePamphilis Journal: Nature Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Klaus Mummenhoff; Peter Linder; Nikolai Friesen; John L Bowman; Ji-Young Lee; Andreas Franzke Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Douglas E Soltis; Victor A Albert; Jim Leebens-Mack; Charles D Bell; Andrew H Paterson; Chunfang Zheng; David Sankoff; Claude W Depamphilis; P Kerr Wall; Pamela S Soltis Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Zoe Bont; Marc Pfander; Christelle A M Robert; Meret Huber; Erik H Poelman; Ciska E Raaijmakers; Matthias Erb Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Terezie Mandáková; Petra Hloušková; Michael D Windham; Thomas Mitchell-Olds; Kaylynn Ashby; Bo Price; John Carman; Martin A Lysak Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 5.753