| Literature DB >> 24693971 |
Markéta Derdáková1, Radovan Václav, Lucia Pangrácova-Blaňárová, Diana Selyemová, Juraj Koči, Gernot Walder, Eva Špitalská.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis is a newly emerging tick-borne bacterium from the family Anaplasmataceae. Its presence in Ixodes ricinus ticks was reported from various European countries, however, it's ecology and co-circulation with another member of the same family, Anaplasma phagocytophilum has not been rigorously studied yet.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24693971 PMCID: PMC3984398 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Map of sampling sites from Austria (A), Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK); Central Europe.
Prevalence of N. mikurensis (CNM) and (AP) in ticks from sampling sites in Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Austria
| Bratislava (SK) | 48°10′N 17°04′E | 378/248 | 4 (1.1) | 10 (4) | Oak-beech, suburban and urban forests |
| Senec (SK) | 48°16′N 17°21′E | 97 | 6 (6.2) | 1 (1) | Native fragmented, dry oak forest |
| Malacky (SK) | 48°26′N 17°01′E | 93/101 | 2 (2.2) | 4 (4) | Urban park with maples, oak hornbeam |
| Záhorská Ves (SK) | 48°22′N 16°53′E | 121 | 14 (11.6) | 5 (4.1) | Farmland and pine lowland forest |
| Martinské hole (SK) | 49°05′N 18°51′E | 219 | 7 (3.2) | 6 (2.7) | Mountain spruce forest |
| Košice (SK) | 48°44′N 21°16′E | 224 | 6 (2.7) | 10 (4.5) | Oak-hornbeam urban forest |
| Bardejov (SK) | 49°19′N 21°16′E | 179 | 8 (4.5) | 3 (1.7) | Oak, beech, maple, birch suburban |
| Dvur Kralove (CZ) | 50°25′N 15°48′E | 138 | 3 (2.2) | 8 (5.8) | Mixed and pine suburban forest |
| Austria total | | 86 | 19 (22.1) | 6 (7.0) | |
| Innsbruck (AT) | 47°17′N 11°26′E | 26 | 5 (19.2) | 3 (11.5) | Mountain fir forest |
| Kundl (AT) | 47°28′N 11°60′E | 51 | 12 (23.5) | 3 (5.9) | Beech-fir forest |
| Radlach (AT) | 46°45′N 13°15′E | 9 | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) | Alder and ash forest |
| Total | 1535/1413 | 69 (4.5) | 53 (3.8) |
*If different numbers of ticks were analyzed for the presence of CNM and AP, two values (CNM/AP) are shown for the site (for Bratislava, 130 larvae were included in analysis for the presence of NM, but they were excluded in analysis for the presence of AP; for Malacky, not all ticks tested for CNM were tested for the presence of AP due to the lack of DNA.
GLMM analysis on the occurrence probability of CNM in questing ticks as a function of the proportion of ticks infected with AP and tick developmental stage
| Random effect | | | | | |
| Site ID | 0.49 | 0.32 | | | 0.128 |
| Fixed effects | | | | | |
| Intercept | -3.33 | 0.37 | 8 | -8.96 | < 0.001 |
| Proportion of ticks infected with AP | 7.02 | 2.69 | 7 | 2.61 | 0.035 |
| Tick developmental stage_adults | -0.01 | 0.30 | 7 | -0.01 | 0.996 |
| Tick developmental stage_nymphs | 0 |
The pseudo-likelihood function was used to calculate parameter estimates. The analysis was conducted with SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and the GLIMMIX macro.