| Literature DB >> 24693324 |
Jie Yu1, Na Li1, Pei Lin1, Yunfei Li1, Xiaojian Mao1, Getuzhaori Bao1, Wen Gu1, Ronghua Zhao1.
Abstract
Context. Polygoni Multiflori Radix (PMR) is originated from the root of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. and used in oriental countries for centuries. However, little researches pay close attention to the absorption of its major constituents. Objective. Transepithelial transport of TSG, RL, PL, and four anthraquinones is carried out. Materials and Methods. Caco-2 cell monolayer, which represented a well-established model for the study of intestinal transport of nutrients and xenobiotics, was used in this paper. Results. The apparent permeability coefficients (P app) in the Caco-2 cell monolayers were TSG (2.372 × 10(-9)) < EG (2.391 × 10(-9)) < EN (2.483 × 10(-9)) < PL (4.917 × 10(-9)) < RN (1.707 × 10(-8)) < RL (1.778 × 10(-8)) < AE (1.952 × 10(-8)). Thus, RN, RL, and AE were considered partly absorbed, while other constituents were hardly absorbed. Discussion and Conclusion. Glycosides showed poor permeabilities than aglycones. In the meantime, TSG and EN gave out poor recovery rates in this assay, which indicated that TSG and EN may accumulate or metabolise in the Caco-2 cells. In silico prediction indicated that Gibbs energy (r = 0.751, p < 0.05) and heat of form (r = 0.701, p < 0.05) were strongly positively correlated with P app.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24693324 PMCID: PMC3944923 DOI: 10.1155/2014/483641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Photographs of Polygoni Multiflori Radix and its processed products. (a) PMR: Polygonum Multiflorum Radix. (b) PMRP: Polygoni Multiflori Radix Praeparata.
Figure 2Structures of analytes in this research.
The linear equation, linear range, and correlation coefficient of nine analytes (n = 6).
| Sample | Linear equation | Related coefficient | Linear range ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSG |
| 0.9987 | 4.305 × 10−6–3.444 × 10−4 |
| EN |
| 1 | 2.664 × 10−5–1.066 × 10−3 |
| RN |
| 0.9992 | 2.322 × 10−5–9.288 × 10−4 |
| AE |
| 0.9996 | 2.664 × 10−5–1.066 × 10−3 |
| RL |
| 0.9993 | 1.733 × 10−5–3.466 × 10−4 |
| PL |
| 0.9999 | 6.892 × 10−6–6.892 × 10−4 |
| EG |
| 0.9999 | 7.040 × 10−6–2.534 × 10−3 |
Figure 3The value of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (Mean ± SD, n ≥ 6, Ω/cm2).
Figure 4The alkaline phosphatase ratio (apical side to basolateral side, ALPAP/ALPBL) in this assay (Mean ± SD, n ≥ 6).
The apparent permeability coefficient (P app) values (Mean, n ≥ 3, cm/s) and recovery rates (Mean ± SD, n ≥ 3) of the seven analytes.
| Compound | TSG | EN | RN | AE | RL | PL | EG | PR | AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.372 × 10−9 | 2.483 × 10−9 | 1.707 × 10−8 | 1.952 × 10−8 | 1.778 × 10−8 | 4.917 × 10−9 | 2.391 × 10−9 | 6.075 × 10−8 | 1.668 × 10−8 |
| Recovery | 17.39 ± 1.600 | 14.48 ± 2.504 | 96.96 ± 7.377 | 42.36 ± 6.323 | 62.39 ± 6.210 | 59.94 ± 9.90 | 33.95 ± 7.06 | 117.1 ± 8.85 | 125.2 ± 33.60 |
Figure 5The apparent permeability coefficient (P app, cm/s) values of TSG, EN, RN, AE, RL, PL, and EG through the Caco-2 monolayer. A: 2,3,5,4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside (TSG), B: emodin (EN), C: rhein (RN), D: aloe-emodin (AE), E: resveratrol (RL), F: polydatin (PL), and G: emodin-8-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (EG).
The apparent permeability coefficient (P app) values (Mean, n ≥ 3, cm/s) and recovery rates (Mean ± SD, n ≥ 3) of the seven analytes.
| Compound | TSG | EN | RN | AE | RL | PL | EG | PR | AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 406.38 | 270.24 | 284.22 | 270.24 | 228.24 | 390.38 | 432.38 | 245.32 | 266.34 |
| Boiling point (K) | 925.79 | 752.86 | 788.86 | 761.48 | 675.11 | 890.96 | 968.71 | 655.04 | 711.80 |
| Melting point (K) | 992.60 | 846.01 | 894.89 | 795.11 | 629.96 | 880.88 | 1096.93 | 450.66 | 524.88 |
| Critical temperature (K) | 1166.96 | 965.47 | 996.03 | 956.41 | 898.50 | 1111.40 | 1238.72 | 833.04 | 887.27 |
| Critical pressure (Bar) | 40.21 | 52.06 | 47.83 | 48.02 | 50.95 | 33.57 | 34.16 | 24.98 | 24.46 |
| Critical volume (cm3/mol) | 1011.50 | 687.50 | 695.50 | 690.50 | 631.50 | 995.50 | 1051.5 | 755.50 | 806.50 |
| Gibbs energy (kJ/mol) | −795.72 | −357.13 | −546.42 | −339.33 | −91.82 | −641.10 | −906.41 | 129.98 | −50.00 |
| Molar refraction index (cm3/mol) | 100.72 | 71.27 | 71.30 | 71.36 | 66.60 | 99.03 | 103.71 | 72.41 | 73.50 |
| Henry's law constant | 26.02 | 18.79 | 19.55 | 19.25 | 14.25 | 22.04 | 26.58 | 10.61 | 16.25 |
| Heat of form (kJ/mol) | −1309.43 | −622.31 | −795.27 | −597.23 | −273.94 | −1132.12 | −1480.49 | −173.06 | −427.56 |
| Log | 0.83 | 1.74 | 1.2 | 1.07 | 3.06 | 1.22 | −0.1 | 2.33 | 0.50 |
| Clog | 0.6538 | 3.617 | 3.529 | 2.700 | 2.833 | 1.517 | 1.650 | 2.444 | −0.1086 |
| Clog | 0.71 | 2.93 | 2.44 | 2.29 | 3.12 | 1.64 | 0.82 | 2.41 | 0.41 |
| Log | −2.45 | −4.19 | −4.15 | −4.02 | −2.86 | −3.21 | −4.07 | −3.2 | −2.02 |
Relationships between physical-chemical properties values and apparent permeability coefficient (P app).
| Correlation coefficient | Pearson's correlation | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | — | — |
| Boiling point | −0.687 | 0.041 |
| Melting point | −0.768 | 0.016 |
| Critical temperature | −0.703 | 0.035 |
| Critical pressure | — | — |
| Critical volume | — | — |
| Gibbs energy | 0.751 | 0.020 |
| Molar refraction index | — | — |
| Heat of form | 0.701 | 0.035 |
| Log | — | — |
| Clog | — | — |
| Clog | — | — |
| Log | — | — |
—: data were not listed when significance (p) was higher than 0.05.
(a) Isocratic elution procedure, detection wavelength, and R of EN, AE, RL, PL, and EG
| Sample | Detection wavelength (nm) | B% |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| EN | 287 | 75 | 11.24 |
| AE | 254 | 80 | 5.042 |
| RL | 306 | 45 | 8.423 |
| PL | 306 | 40 | 6.568 |
| EG | 280 | 55 | 12.11 |
(b) Gradient elution procedure, detection wavelength, and R of TSG and RN
| Sample |
Detection | B% |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 5 min | 10 min | |||
| TSG | 320 | 40 | 55 | 70 | 6.513 |
| RN | 254 | 85 | / | 90 | 5.307 |
Mobile phase A: 0.1% H3PO4.
Mobile phase B: methanol.