Literature DB >> 24692319

Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus.

Dag Alnæs1, Markus Handal Sneve, Thomas Espeseth, Tor Endestad, Steven Harry Pieter van de Pavert, Bruno Laeng.   

Abstract

Attentional effort relates to the allocation of limited-capacity attentional resources to meet current task demands and involves the activation of top-down attentional systems in the brain. Pupillometry is a sensitive measure of this intensity aspect of top-down attentional control. Studies relate pupillary changes in response to cognitive processing to activity in the locus coeruleus (LC), which is the main hub of the brain's noradrenergic system and it is thought to modulate the operations of the brain's attentional systems. In the present study, participants performed a visual divided attention task known as multiple object tracking (MOT) while their pupil sizes were recorded by use of an infrared eye tracker and then were tested again with the same paradigm while brain activity was recorded using fMRI. We hypothesized that the individual pupil dilations, as an index of individual differences in mental effort, as originally proposed by Kahneman (1973), would be a better predictor of LC activity than the number of tracked objects during MOT. The current results support our hypothesis, since we observed pupil-related activity in the LC. Moreover, the changes in the pupil correlated with activity in the superior colliculus and the right thalamus, as well as cortical activity in the dorsal attention network, which previous studies have shown to be strongly activated during visual tracking of multiple targets. Follow-up pupillometric analyses of the MOT task in the same individuals also revealed that individual differences to cognitive load can be remarkably stable over a lag of several years. To our knowledge this is the first study using pupil dilations as an index of attentional effort in the MOT task and also relating these to functional changes in the brain that directly implicate the LC-NE system in the allocation of processing resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; divided attention; effort; fMRI; locus coeruleus; multifocal attention; multiple object tracking; norepinephrine; pupillometry; superior colliculus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24692319     DOI: 10.1167/14.4.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  116 in total

1.  Putting effort into infant cognition.

Authors:  Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Pupil responses and pain ratings to heat stimuli: Reliability and effects of expectations and a conditioning pain stimulus.

Authors:  James C Eisenach; Regina Curry; Carol A Aschenbrenner; Robert C Coghill; Timothy T Houle
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Physiological regulation and social-emotional processing in female carriers of the FMR1 premutation.

Authors:  Molly Winston; Kritika Nayar; Abigail L Hogan; Jamie Barstein; Chelsea La Valle; Kevin Sharp; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Molly Losh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-11-22

4.  Depressed Adolescents' Pupillary Response to Peer Acceptance and Rejection: The Role of Rumination.

Authors:  Lindsey B Stone; Jennifer S Silk; Greg J Siegle; Kyung Hwa Lee; Laura R Stroud; Eric E Nelson; Ronald E Dahl; Neil P Jones
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2016-06

5.  Mind over motor mapping: Driver response to changing vehicle dynamics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruno; Joseph M Baker; Andrew Gundran; Lene K Harbott; Zachary Stuart; Aaron M Piccirilli; S M Hadi Hosseini; J Christian Gerdes; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Pupillary Responses as a Biomarker of Early Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Eric L Granholm; Matthew S Panizzon; Jeremy A Elman; Amy J Jak; Richard L Hauger; Mark W Bondi; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; William S Kremen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens Prioritized Memories Under Arousal.

Authors:  David V Clewett; Ringo Huang; Rico Velasco; Tae-Ho Lee; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

Review 10.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.