Literature DB >> 24692309

Decision making in liver transplantation--limited application of the liver donor risk index.

Leslie Mataya1, Andrew Aronsohn, J Richard Thistlethwaite, Lainie Friedman Ross.   

Abstract

The liver donor risk index (LDRI), originally developed in 2006 by Feng et al. and since modified, is a method of evaluating liver grafts from deceased donors through the determination of the relative risk of graft failure after transplantation. Online and paper surveys about attitudes and practices regarding decision making in liver transplantation and the role of the LDRI were sent to liver transplant physicians. One hundred forty-seven of 401 eligible respondents (37%) returned partial or complete surveys. The majority of the respondents were male (116/134 or 87%) and practiced in academic medical centers (128/138 or 93%). Transplant coordinators initially contacted the candidate with an offer in 81% of the programs. Eighty-eight of 143 respondents (62%) reported that they were very familiar with the LDRI, but the vast majority (114/137 or 83%) rarely or never discussed the concept of the LDRI with their patients. A majority of the respondents (96/132 or 73%) believed that the LDRI does not adequately describe a liver's relative risk of graft failure and that there are factors making the LDRI potentially misleading (122/138 or 88%). Nevertheless, 60 of 130 respondents (46%) believed that the LDRI would increase/improve shared decision making. The LDRI has not been widely adopted because of concerns that (1) it does not accurately reflect posttransplant survival, (2) it excludes relevant donor and recipient factors, and (3) it is too complicated for candidates to grasp. There is a need to improve it or to develop other decision-making tools to help promote shared decision making. There is also great diversity in how liver offers are made to ambulatory candidates and in how transplant programs address a candidate's refusal. Research is needed to determine evidence-based best practice.
© 2014 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24692309      PMCID: PMC4072766          DOI: 10.1002/lt.23879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  19 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Donor race does not predict graft failure after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; Young-Suk Lim; Terry M Therneau; Rachel A Pedersen; Julie Heimbach; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.

Authors:  C Thorpe; B Ryan; S L McLean; A Burt; M Stewart; J B Brown; G J Reid; S Harris
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Waiting time, not donor-risk-index, is a major determinant for beneficial outcome after liver transplantation in high-MELD patients.

Authors:  Falk Rauchfuss; Ahmed Zidan; Hubert Scheuerlein; Yves Dittmar; Astrid Bauschke; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.530

5.  Development and validation of a model predicting graft survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  George N Ioannou
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Race: a critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation?

Authors:  D E Eckhoff; B M McGuire; C J Young; M T Sellers; L R Frenette; S L Hudson; J L Contreras; S Bynon
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1998-11

7.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Donor risk index and organ patient index as predictors of graft survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  A W Avolio; M Siciliano; R Barbarino; E Nure; B E Annicchiarico; A Gasbarrini; S Agnes; M Castagneto
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Donor factors predicting recipient survival after liver retransplantation: the retransplant donor risk index.

Authors:  P G Northup; T L Pruett; D M Kashmer; C K Argo; C L Berg; T M Schmitt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Prognostic evaluation of the donor risk index among a prospective cohort of Italian patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Vitale; F D'Amico; E Gringeri; M Valmasoni; A Pauletto; P Bonsignore; D Bassi; F E D'Amico; M Polacco; P Burra; F Russo; P Angeli; C Poci; P Feltracco; A Romano; U Cillo
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  6 in total

1.  A rapid, reproducible, noninvasive predictor of liver graft survival.

Authors:  Ali Zarrinpar; Coney Lee; Emily Noguchi; Hasan Yersiz; Vatche G Agopian; Fady M Kaldas; Douglas G Farmer; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  The corrected donor age for hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Melisa Dirchwolf; Jennifer L Dodge; Jane Gralla; Kiran M Bambha; Trevor Nydam; Kenneth W Hung; Hugo R Rosen; Sandy Feng; Norah A Terrault; Scott W Biggins
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Lawrence Lau; Yamuna Kankanige; Benjamin Rubinstein; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; James Bailey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Changes in Discard Rate After the Introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI).

Authors:  S Bae; A B Massie; X Luo; S Anjum; N M Desai; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Joerg Boecker; Zoltan Czigany; Jan Bednarsch; Iakovos Amygdalos; Franziska Meister; Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Wen-Jia Liu; Pavel Strnad; Ulf Peter Neumann; Georg Lurje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Warren T McKinney; Jack R Lake; Srinath Chinnakotla; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.