BACKGROUND: The anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) can be seen in one-third of patients after discontinuation of first-generation non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy. With the introduction of new agents for anti-androgen therapy as well as alternate mechanisms of action, new therapeutic options before and after docetaxel chemotherapy have arisen (Ohlmann et al. in World J Urol 30(4):495-503, 2012). The question regarding the occurrence of an enzalutamide withdrawal syndrome (EWS) has not been evaluated yet. In this study, we assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after discontinuation of enzalutamide. METHODS: In total 31 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) underwent an enzalutamide withdrawal and were evaluated. Data were gathered from 6 centres in Germany. Patients with continuous oral administration of enzalutamide with rising serum PSA levels were evaluated, starting from enzalutamide withdrawal until subsequent therapy was initiated, follow-up ended or death of the patient occurred. Statistical evaluation was performed applying one-sided binomial testing using R-statistical software, version 3.0.1. RESULTS: Mean withdrawal follow-up was 6.5 weeks (range 1-26.1 weeks). None of the 31 patients showed a PSA decline. Mean relative PSA rise over all patients was 73.9 % (range 0.5-440.7 %) with a median of 44.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: If existent, an AAWS is at least very rare for enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC after taxane-based chemotherapy and does not play a clinical role in this setting. This may be attributed to the different pharmacodynamics of enzalutamide. Longer duration of therapy or a longer withdrawal interval may reveal a rare EWS in the future.
BACKGROUND: The anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) can be seen in one-third of patients after discontinuation of first-generation non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy. With the introduction of new agents for anti-androgen therapy as well as alternate mechanisms of action, new therapeutic options before and after docetaxel chemotherapy have arisen (Ohlmann et al. in World J Urol 30(4):495-503, 2012). The question regarding the occurrence of an enzalutamidewithdrawal syndrome (EWS) has not been evaluated yet. In this study, we assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after discontinuation of enzalutamide. METHODS: In total 31 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) underwent an enzalutamide withdrawal and were evaluated. Data were gathered from 6 centres in Germany. Patients with continuous oral administration of enzalutamide with rising serum PSA levels were evaluated, starting from enzalutamide withdrawal until subsequent therapy was initiated, follow-up ended or death of the patient occurred. Statistical evaluation was performed applying one-sided binomial testing using R-statistical software, version 3.0.1. RESULTS: Mean withdrawal follow-up was 6.5 weeks (range 1-26.1 weeks). None of the 31 patients showed a PSA decline. Mean relative PSA rise over all patients was 73.9 % (range 0.5-440.7 %) with a median of 44.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: If existent, an AAWS is at least very rare for enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC after taxane-based chemotherapy and does not play a clinical role in this setting. This may be attributed to the different pharmacodynamics of enzalutamide. Longer duration of therapy or a longer withdrawal interval may reveal a rare EWS in the future.
Authors: P F Schellhammer; P Venner; G P Haas; E J Small; P T Nieh; D R Seabaugh; A L Patterson; E Klein; Z Wajsman; B Furr; Y Chen; G J Kolvenbag Journal: J Urol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: M Colombel; F Symmans; S Gil; K M O'Toole; D Chopin; M Benson; C A Olsson; S Korsmeyer; R Buttyan Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Mei Sun; Lin Yang; Richard I Feldman; Xia-meng Sun; Kapil N Bhalla; Richard Jove; Santo V Nicosia; Jin Q Cheng Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-08-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Manav Korpal; Joshua M Korn; Xueliang Gao; Daniel P Rakiec; David A Ruddy; Shivang Doshi; Jing Yuan; Steve G Kovats; Sunkyu Kim; Vesselina G Cooke; John E Monahan; Frank Stegmeier; Thomas M Roberts; William R Sellers; Wenlai Zhou; Ping Zhu Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Frank Claessens; Christine Helsen; Stefan Prekovic; Thomas Van den Broeck; Lien Spans; Hendrik Van Poppel; Steven Joniau Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 14.432