| Literature DB >> 24691065 |
Tzu-Shao Yeh1, Chi-Chang Huang2, Hsiao-Li Chuang3, Mei-Chich Hsu4.
Abstract
Angelica sinensis (AS) is a well-known medicinal herb and food material with antioxidative and multifunctional pharmacological activities. However, we lack evidence of the effect of AS on exercise performance and physical fatigue. We aimed to evaluate the potential beneficial effect of AS on ergogenic and anti-fatigue functions after physiological challenge. Male ICR strain mice were randomly assigned to four groups (n=10 per group) for treatment: (1) sedentary control and vehicle treatment (vehicle control); (2) exercise training with vehicle treatment (exercise control); (3) exercise training with AS treatment at 0.41 g/kg/day (Ex-AS1); and (4) 2.05 g/kg/day (Ex-AS5); both the vehicle and AS were orally administered for 6 weeks. Exercise performance and anti-fatigue function were evaluated by forelimb grip strength, exhaustive swimming time, and levels of serum lactate, ammonia, glucose, and creatine kinase (CK) after a 15-min swimming exercise. Trend analysis revealed that AS treatments significantly increased endurance swimming time and blood glucose level, and decreased serum lactate, ammonia and CK levels. Liver and muscle glycogen contents were higher for Ex-AS1 and Ex-AS5 groups than the exercise control. Therefore, AS supplementation improved exercise performance and had anti-fatigue properties in mice and may be an effective ergogenic aid in exercise training.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24691065 PMCID: PMC6271504 DOI: 10.3390/molecules19043926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of AS supplementation on the changes of body weight. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 10 mice per group.
General characteristics of the experimental groups.
| Characteristic | Vehicle Control | Exercise Control | Ex-AS1 | Ex-AS5 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Liver | 2.16 | ± | 0.03 | 2.14 | ± | 0.03 | 2.11 | ± | 0.04 | 2.14 | ± | 0.04 | ||||
| Kidney | 0.61 | ± | 0.01 | 0.65 | ± | 0.02 | 0.64 | ± | 0.01 | 0.66 | ± | 0.01 | ||||
| EFP | 0.52 | ± | 0.03 | 0.47 | ± | 0.02 | 0.44 | ± | 0.04 | 0.46 | ± | 0.04 | ||||
| Muscle | 0.36 | ± | 0.01 | 0.36 | ± | 0.01 | 0.36 | ± | 0.01 | 0.38 | ± | 0.00 | ||||
| BAT | 0.13 | ± | 0.01 | 0.15 | ± | 0.01 | 0.15 | ± | 0.01 | 0.13 | ± | 0.01 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Liver | 6.07 | ± | 0.07 | 5.97 | ± | 0.07 | 5.93 | ± | 0.08 | 5.84 | ± | 0.13 | ||||
| Kidney | 1.72 | ± | 0.03 | 1.81 | ± | 0.04 | 1.81 | ± | 0.03 | 1.81 | ± | 0.03 | ||||
| EFP | 1.45 | ± | 0.06 | 1.30 | ± | 0.07 | 1.25 | ± | 0.10 | 1.25 | ± | 0.10 | ||||
| Muscle | 1.01 | ± | 0.02 | 1.02 | ± | 0.02 | 1.02 | ± | 0.03 | 1.03 | ± | 0.02 | ||||
| BAT | 0.37 | ± | 0.01 | 0.42 | ± | 0.02 | 0.41 | ± | 0.02 | 0.37 | ± | 0.02 | ||||
Data are mean ± SEM for 10 mice in each group. EFP: epididymal fat pads; BAT: brown adipose tissue. Muscle mass includes both gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the back part of the lower legs.
Figure 2Effect of AS supplementation on forelimb grip strength (A) and endurance swimming time (B). Data are mean ± SEM of 10 mice in each group by one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of AS supplementation on serum lactate (A), ammonia (B), and glucose (C) levels and CK (D) activity immediately after 15-min swimming test without weight loading. Data are mean ± SEM of 10 mice in each group by one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of AS supplementation on hepatic glycogen (A) and muscle glycogen (B) level. Data are mean ± SEM of 10 mice in each group by one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b, c and d) indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Biochemical analysis of AS treatment groups at the end of the experiment.
| Parameter | Vehicle Control | Exercise Control | Ex-AS1 | Ex-AS5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 63 ± 3 | 69 ± 4 | 66 ± 3 | 67 ± 3 |
| ALT (U/L) | 42 ± 3 a | 54 ± 2 b | 47 ± 2 ab | 48 ± 3 ab |
| ALP (U/L) | 49 ± 3 | 63 ± 6 | 59 ± 3 | 54 ± 2 |
| LDH (U/L) | 301 ± 19 | 273 ± 23 | 304 ± 15 | 297 ± 20 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.0 |
| TBIL (μg/dL) | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
| TP (g/dL) | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.1 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 23.4 ± 0.8 | 23.1 ± 1.0 | 23.8 ± 1.2 | 21.9 ± 0.8 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| UA (mg/dL) | 1.43 ± 0.11 b | 0.83 ± 0.05 a | 1.45 ± 0.07 b | 1.10 ± 0.07 ab |
| TG (mg/dL) | 228 ± 21 b | 184 ± 20 ab | 147 ± 8 a | 164 ± 11 ab |
| TC (mg/dL) | 111 ± 4 | 104 ± 4 | 122 ± 5 | 122 ± 5 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 180 ± 6 | 182 ± 7 | 185 ± 6 | 175 ± 5 |
Data are mean ± SEM for 10 mice in each group. Data in the same line with different letters (a and b) significantly differ at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TBIL, total bilirubin; TP, total protein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; TG, triacylglycerol; TC, total cholesterol.
Figure 5Effect of AS supplementation on the morphology of liver (A), skeletal muscle (B), heart (C), kidney (D), lungs (E), and testes (F) tissues. Specimens were photographed with a light microscope. (H&E stain, magnification: ×200, Scale bar, 40 μm).