Literature DB >> 21311352

Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training.

Luis Sánchez-Medina1, Juan José González-Badillo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the acute mechanical and metabolic response to resistance exercise protocols (REP) differing in the number of repetitions (R) performed in each set (S) with respect to the maximum predicted number (P).
METHODS: Over 21 exercise sessions separated by 48-72 h, 18 strength-trained males (10 in bench press (BP) and 8 in squat (SQ)) performed 1) a progressive test for one-repetition maximum (1RM) and load-velocity profile determination, 2) tests of maximal number of repetitions to failure (12RM, 10RM, 8RM, 6RM, and 4RM), and 3) 15 REP (S × R[P]: 3 × 6[12], 3 × 8[12], 3 × 10[12], 3 × 12[12], 3 × 6[10], 3 × 8[10], 3 × 10[10], 3 × 4[8], 3 × 6[8], 3 × 8[8], 3 × 3[6], 3 × 4[6], 3 × 6[6], 3 × 2[4], 3 × 4[4]), with 5-min interset rests. Kinematic data were registered by a linear velocity transducer. Blood lactate and ammonia were measured before and after exercise.
RESULTS: Mean repetition velocity loss after three sets, loss of velocity pre-post exercise against the 1-m·s load, and countermovement jump height loss (SQ group) were significant for all REP and were highly correlated to each other (r = 0.91-0.97). Velocity loss was significantly greater for BP compared with SQ and strongly correlated to peak postexercise lactate (r = 0.93-0.97) for both SQ and BP. Unlike lactate, ammonia showed a curvilinear response to loss of velocity, only increasing above resting levels when R was at least two repetitions higher than 50% of P.
CONCLUSIONS: Velocity loss and metabolic stress clearly differs when manipulating the number of repetitions actually performed in each training set. The high correlations found between mechanical (velocity and countermovement jump height losses) and metabolic (lactate, ammonia) measures of fatigue support the validity of using velocity loss to objectively quantify neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311352     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213f880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  97 in total

Review 1.  Training Monitoring for Resistance Exercise: Theory and Applications.

Authors:  Brendan R Scott; Grant M Duthie; Heidi R Thornton; Ben J Dascombe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Seasonal strength performance and its relationship with training load on elite runners.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; Carlos M Tejero-González; Juan Del Campo-Vecino
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Predicting vertical jump height from bar velocity.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Igor Štirn; Paulino Padial; Javier Argüelles-Cienfuegos; Blanca De la Fuente; Vojko Strojnik; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Reliability and validity assessment of a linear position transducer.

Authors:  Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño; Silvia López-Lastra; José L Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Optimal Training Sequences to Develop Lower Body Force, Velocity, Power, and Jump Height: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James Marshall; Chris Bishop; Anthony Turner; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Analysis of the Load-Velocity Relationship in Deadlift Exercise.

Authors:  Alejandro Benavides-Ubric; David M Díez-Fernández; Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez; Manuel Ortega-Becerra; Fernando Pareja-Blanco
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure.

Authors:  Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Carlos E Pérez; Ricardo Mora-Rodríguez; Ernesto de la Cruz-Sánchez; Juan José González-Badillo; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Alejandro Torrejón; Belén Feriche; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Paulino Padial; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Range of Motion and Sticking Region Effects on the Bench Press Load-Velocity Relationship.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez-Cava; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte; Javier Courel-Ibáñez; Elena Conesa-Ros; Juan José González-Badillo; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Cardiometabolic and Muscular Fatigue Responses to Different CrossFit® Workouts.

Authors:  José L Maté-Muñoz; Juan H Lougedo; Manuel Barba; Ana M Cañuelo-Márquez; Jesús Guodemar-Pérez; Pablo García-Fernández; María Del C Lozano-Estevan; Rosa Alonso-Melero; María A Sánchez-Calabuig; Monserrat Ruíz-López; Fernando de Jesús; Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.