Literature DB >> 24690983

Reducing the negative vocal effects of superficial laryngeal dehydration with humidification.

Elizabeth Erickson Levendoski, Anusha Sundarrajan, M Preeti Sivasankar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Environmental humidification is a simple, cost-effective method believed to reduce superficial laryngeal drying. This study sought to validate this belief by investigating whether humidification treatment would reduce the negative effects of superficial laryngeal dehydration on phonation threshold pressure (PTP). Phonation threshold pressure data analysis may be vulnerable to bias because of lack of investigator blinding. Consequently, this study investigated the extent of PTP analysis reliability between unblinded and blinded investigators.
METHODS: Healthy male and female adults were assigned to a vocal fatigue (n = 20) or control group (n = 20) based on their responses to a questionnaire. PTP was assessed after 2 hours of mouth breathing in low humidity (dehydration challenge), following a 5-minute break in ambient humidity, and after 2 hours of mouth breathing in high humidity (humidification).
RESULTS: PTP significantly increased following the laryngeal dehydration challenge. After humidification, PTP returned toward baseline. These effects were observed in both subject groups. PTP measurements were highly correlated between the unblinded and blinded investigator.
CONCLUSIONS: Humidification may be an effective approach to decrease the detrimental voice effects of superficial laryngeal dehydration. These data lay the foundation for future investigations aimed at preventing and treating the negative voice changes associated with chronic, surface laryngeal drying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24690983      PMCID: PMC5441306          DOI: 10.1177/0003489414527230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  27 in total

1.  Oral breathing increases Pth and vocal effort by superficial drying of vocal fold mucosa.

Authors:  Mahalakshmi Sivasankar; Kimberly V Fisher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Nebulized isotonic saline versus water following a laryngeal desiccation challenge in classically trained sopranos.

Authors:  Kristine Tanner; Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Faye Muntz; Daniel R Houtz; Cara Sauder; Mark Elstad; Julie Wright-Costa
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perceived phonatory effort and phonation threshold pressure across a prolonged voice loading task: a study of vocal fatigue.

Authors:  Ann Chang; Michael P Karnell
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Phonation threshold pressure across the pitch range: preliminary test of a model.

Authors:  Nancy Pearl Solomon; Pradeep Ramanathan; Matthew J Makashay
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Laryngeal airway resistance in teachers with vocal fatigue: a preliminary study.

Authors:  B E Kostyk; A Putnam Rochet
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level.

Authors:  K Verdolini; I R Titze; A Fennell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-10

7.  Blinding during the analysis of research data.

Authors:  Denise F Polit
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Vocal function and upper airway thermoregulation in five different environmental conditions.

Authors:  Mary J Sandage; Nadine P Connor; David D Pascoe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  An evaluation of the effects of three laryngeal lubricants on phonation threshold pressure (PTP).

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Kristine Tanner; Steven D Gray; Michael Blomgren; Kimberly V Fisher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  The effects of three nebulized osmotic agents in the dry larynx.

Authors:  Kristine Tanner; Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Mark Elstad
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  Toward a Consensus Description of Vocal Effort, Vocal Load, Vocal Loading, and Vocal Fatigue.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Eva van Leer; Miriam van Mersbergen; Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran; Pasquale Bottalico; Mary J Sandage; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Gabrielle L Hands; Carolyn R Calabrese; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices about vocal hygiene for their children in Chengdu, a city from China.

Authors:  Dan Lu; Edwin M-L Yiu; Dai Pu; Hui Yang; Estella P-M Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.